%0 Journal Article
%T Prediction of Final Body Height for Female Patients With Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.
%A Cheung PWH
%A Mannem A
%A Cheung JPY
%J Global Spine J
%V 11
%N 6
%D Jul 2021
%M 32762380
%F 2.23
%R 10.1177/2192568220941450
%X <B>UNASSIGNED: </B>Retrospective cohort study.<BR><B>UNASSIGNED: </B>To explore the possibility of predicting final body height at maturity based on associating parameters at the time of diagnosing adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), while examining the effect of curve magnitude and deterioration.<BR><B>UNASSIGNED: </B>A total of 284 female patients with AIS (mean age 12.2 ± 1.1 years, 52.5% premenarchal) were followed till skeletal maturity, indicated by ≥Risser stage 4, static body height and arm span over the past 6 months, and postmenarche 2 years. Standing body height, arm span, menarchal status, Risser staging, distal radius and ulna (DRU) classification, Sanders staging (SS), Cobb angles (major and minor curves), and Lenke curve types at initial presentation were examined. Patients with/without curve deterioration were compared. Multiple linear regression was used for predicting final body height (cm), and remaining height increase (%).<BR><B>UNASSIGNED: </B>Baseline body height was 152.1 ± 7.1 cm and major curve Cobb angle was 27.1° ± 7.4°, whereas at maturity they were 159.5 ± 5.4 cm and 32.5° ± 9.3°, respectively. For patients presented at Risser stage 0 or 1, radius grade (R) 6, ulnar grade (U) 5, or SS3, those with curve deterioration exhibited greater height increase potential at initial presentation (P < .05) than those without deterioration. No intergroup difference was found for patients presented at ≥Risser 2, R7, U6, SS4. Predictive baseline parameters were age, body height, Cobb angle (major curve), curve type, and DRU grades. Prediction models of final body height (R 2 = 0.735, P < .001) and remaining height increase (R 2 = 0.742, P < .001) were established.<BR><B>UNASSIGNED: </B>Final body height prediction model was derived for female patients with AIS, with baseline body height and ulnar grading having larger impacts than other parameters.