%0 Comparative Study
%T Evaluation of the Acute Kidney Injury Network criteria in hospitalized patients with cirrhosis and ascites.
%A Piano S
%A Rosi S
%A Maresio G
%A Fasolato S
%A Cavallin M
%A Romano A
%A Morando F
%A Gola E
%A Frigo AC
%A Gatta A
%A Angeli P
%J J Hepatol
%V 59
%N 3
%D Sep 2013
%M 23665185
%F 30.083
%R 10.1016/j.jhep.2013.03.039
%X OBJECTIVE: For several years hepatologists have defined acute renal failure in patients with cirrhosis as an increase in serum creatinine (sCr) ≥ 50% to a final value of sCr>1.5mg/dl (conventional criterion). Recently, the Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) defined acute renal failure as acute kidney injury (AKI) on the basis of an absolute increase in sCr of 0.3mg/dl or a percentage increase in sCr ≥ 50% providing also a staging from 1 to 3. AKIN stage 1 was defined as an increase in sCr ≥ 0.3mg/dl or increase in sCr ≥ 1.5-fold to 2-fold from baseline. AKI diagnosed with the two different criteria was evaluated for the prediction of in-hospital mortality.
METHODS: Consecutive hospitalized patients with cirrhosis and ascites were included in the study and evaluated for the development of AKI.
RESULTS: Conventional criterion was found to be more accurate than AKIN criteria in improving the prediction of in-hospital mortality in a model including age and Child-Turcotte-Pugh score. The addition of either progression of AKIN stage or a threshold value for sCr of 1.5mg/dl further improves the value of AKIN criteria in this model. More in detail, patients with AKIN stage 1 and sCr<1.5mg/dl had a lower mortality rate (p=0.03), a lower progression rate (p=0.01), and a higher improvement rate (p=0.025) than patients with AKIN stage 1 and sCr ≥ 1.5mg/dl.
CONCLUSIONS: Conventional criterion is more accurate than AKIN criteria in the prediction of in-hospital mortality in patients with cirrhosis and ascites. The addition of either the progression of AKIN stage or the cut-off of sCr ≥ 1.5mg/dl to the AKIN criteria improves their prognostic accuracy.