Abstract：
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the publication rate for orthopaedic trauma resident research projects that receive grant funding and the long-term academic involvement of the grant recipients.
METHODS:
METHODS: Retrospective.
METHODS: Publically available records for resident research grant recipients.
UNASSIGNED: Resident research grants on orthopaedic trauma topics from Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA), AO North America (AONA), and Orthopaedic Research and Education Foundation from 2000 to 2022.
UNASSIGNED: Subsequent related publications, grant size, time to publication, sustained academic involvement of the residents as measured by academic position, total number of publications, and h-index.
RESULTS: Three hundred ninety-seven orthopaedic trauma grants (OTA 117, AONA 225, and OREF 55) were identified. A total of 38% (151) of grants resulted in a publication with no significant difference between agencies (P = 0.94). The average amount awarded was $9,843, with no correlation to publication (P = 0.63). The mean time to publication was 3.57 ± 2.33 years. The time to publication for AONA was significantly longer than for OTA (4.14 vs. 2.83 years, P = 0.004). There was no difference in total publications, h-index, or NIH grants between grant recipients from different agencies. More OTA grant recipients held an academic position compared with AONA grant recipients (63% vs. 43%, P = 0.003). Grant awardees with initial publication success were 1.7 times as likely to have a future academic appointment (P = 0.014) and had 1.9 times the number of publications than those without (P = 0.001). Awardees with an h-index in the top quartile were significantly more likely to have published than those with an h-index in the bottom quartile (P = 0.007).
CONCLUSIONS: Fewer than half of orthopaedic trauma-related resident research grants resulted in a publication with comparable rates across agencies. Grant size did not predict publication success. Publication success was a positive predictor of continued academic involvement. Most publications occurred within 5 years, suggesting that these grants may be most helpful in career development if awarded during the first 1-2 years of a 5-year orthopaedic residency program.
METHODS:
METHODS: Retrospective.
METHODS: Publically available records for resident research grant recipients.
UNASSIGNED: Resident research grants on orthopaedic trauma topics from Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA), AO North America (AONA), and Orthopaedic Research and Education Foundation from 2000 to 2022.
UNASSIGNED: Subsequent related publications, grant size, time to publication, sustained academic involvement of the residents as measured by academic position, total number of publications, and h-index.
RESULTS: Three hundred ninety-seven orthopaedic trauma grants (OTA 117, AONA 225, and OREF 55) were identified. A total of 38% (151) of grants resulted in a publication with no significant difference between agencies (P = 0.94). The average amount awarded was $9,843, with no correlation to publication (P = 0.63). The mean time to publication was 3.57 ± 2.33 years. The time to publication for AONA was significantly longer than for OTA (4.14 vs. 2.83 years, P = 0.004). There was no difference in total publications, h-index, or NIH grants between grant recipients from different agencies. More OTA grant recipients held an academic position compared with AONA grant recipients (63% vs. 43%, P = 0.003). Grant awardees with initial publication success were 1.7 times as likely to have a future academic appointment (P = 0.014) and had 1.9 times the number of publications than those without (P = 0.001). Awardees with an h-index in the top quartile were significantly more likely to have published than those with an h-index in the bottom quartile (P = 0.007).
CONCLUSIONS: Fewer than half of orthopaedic trauma-related resident research grants resulted in a publication with comparable rates across agencies. Grant size did not predict publication success. Publication success was a positive predictor of continued academic involvement. Most publications occurred within 5 years, suggesting that these grants may be most helpful in career development if awarded during the first 1-2 years of a 5-year orthopaedic residency program.
摘要：
目的：本研究的目的是确定接受资助的骨科创伤住院医师研究项目的发表率和资助接受者的长期学术参与。
方法：
方法：回顾性分析。
方法：居民研究补助金接受者的公开记录。
■骨科创伤协会（OTA）关于骨科创伤主题的居民研究资助，AO北美（AONA），以及2000年至2022年的骨科研究和教育基金会。
■后续相关出版物，赠款大小，出版时间,以学术地位衡量的居民的持续学术参与，出版物总数,和h-index。
结果：确定了三百九十七项骨科创伤补助金（OTA117、AONA225和OREF55）。共有38％（151）的赠款导致出版物在机构之间没有显着差异（P=0.94）。授予的平均金额为9,843美元，与出版物无关（P=0.63）。平均出版时间为3.57±2.33年。AONA的发布时间明显长于OTA（4.14vs.2.83年,P=0.004)。总出版物没有差异，h-index,或来自不同机构的赠款接受者之间的NIH赠款。与AONA赠款接受者相比，更多的OTA赠款接受者担任学术职位（63%与43%,P=0.003)。最初出版成功的授予获奖者是未来学术任命的1.7倍（P=0.014），出版物数量是没有出版物的1.9倍（P=0.001）。h指数在前四分位数的获奖者比h指数在后四分位数的获奖者更有可能发表（P=0.007）。
结论：不到一半的骨科创伤相关居民研究资助导致了一份机构间具有可比性的出版物。授予大小无法预测发布成功。出版成功是持续学术参与的积极预测因素。大多数出版物发生在5年内，这表明，如果在5年骨科住院医师计划的前1-2年内授予，这些补助金可能对职业发展最有帮助。
方法：
方法：回顾性分析。
方法：居民研究补助金接受者的公开记录。
■骨科创伤协会（OTA）关于骨科创伤主题的居民研究资助，AO北美（AONA），以及2000年至2022年的骨科研究和教育基金会。
■后续相关出版物，赠款大小，出版时间,以学术地位衡量的居民的持续学术参与，出版物总数,和h-index。
结果：确定了三百九十七项骨科创伤补助金（OTA117、AONA225和OREF55）。共有38％（151）的赠款导致出版物在机构之间没有显着差异（P=0.94）。授予的平均金额为9,843美元，与出版物无关（P=0.63）。平均出版时间为3.57±2.33年。AONA的发布时间明显长于OTA（4.14vs.2.83年,P=0.004)。总出版物没有差异，h-index,或来自不同机构的赠款接受者之间的NIH赠款。与AONA赠款接受者相比，更多的OTA赠款接受者担任学术职位（63%与43%,P=0.003)。最初出版成功的授予获奖者是未来学术任命的1.7倍（P=0.014），出版物数量是没有出版物的1.9倍（P=0.001）。h指数在前四分位数的获奖者比h指数在后四分位数的获奖者更有可能发表（P=0.007）。
结论：不到一半的骨科创伤相关居民研究资助导致了一份机构间具有可比性的出版物。授予大小无法预测发布成功。出版成功是持续学术参与的积极预测因素。大多数出版物发生在5年内，这表明，如果在5年骨科住院医师计划的前1-2年内授予，这些补助金可能对职业发展最有帮助。
