PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
UNASSIGNED: The accuracy and reliability of health information disseminated through news is crucial, as it directly impacts both individual and societal health outcomes. This study aims to analyze the publication process of health content in Türkiye and its implications for public health. By examining the perspectives of various health communication stakeholders, the study seeks to identify existing issues and propose potential solutions.
UNASSIGNED: The research uses a mixed-methods approach, including baseline content analysis of 846 news by 133 criteria, quantitative research with 78 participants encompassing bureaucrats, academics, journalists, and health association members, and 15 in-depth interviews for comprehensive insights.
UNASSIGNED: The content analysis indicated that 23.2% of the analyzed news articles lacked credible sources, while 63% did not mention the author\'s name. A striking 96.2% of respondents stated that inaccurate health news poses a risk to public health, emphasizing the urgent need for standardized reporting practices. The majority (90.9%) pinpointed the media as the primary catalysts for infodemic spread, with 93.5% citing gatekeepers as barriers to accurate information. Eroding trust in media, fueled by unethical practices, harms both media credibility and effective public health interventions.
UNASSIGNED: The study underscores the necessity for a collaborative approach among public institutions, academia, and media, focusing on responsibility, regulation, and sanctions against the infodemic. The research advocates for a balanced approach that prioritizes health rights and press freedom within a stakeholder-driven framework, highlighting that legislation alone cannot fully enhance the digital information ecosystem.
UNASSIGNED: The research uses a mixed-methods approach, including baseline content analysis of 846 news by 133 criteria, quantitative research with 78 participants encompassing bureaucrats, academics, journalists, and health association members, and 15 in-depth interviews for comprehensive insights.
UNASSIGNED: The content analysis indicated that 23.2% of the analyzed news articles lacked credible sources, while 63% did not mention the author\'s name. A striking 96.2% of respondents stated that inaccurate health news poses a risk to public health, emphasizing the urgent need for standardized reporting practices. The majority (90.9%) pinpointed the media as the primary catalysts for infodemic spread, with 93.5% citing gatekeepers as barriers to accurate information. Eroding trust in media, fueled by unethical practices, harms both media credibility and effective public health interventions.
UNASSIGNED: The study underscores the necessity for a collaborative approach among public institutions, academia, and media, focusing on responsibility, regulation, and sanctions against the infodemic. The research advocates for a balanced approach that prioritizes health rights and press freedom within a stakeholder-driven framework, highlighting that legislation alone cannot fully enhance the digital information ecosystem.
摘要：
■通过新闻传播的健康信息的准确性和可靠性至关重要，因为它直接影响个人和社会健康结果。本研究旨在分析Türkiye健康内容的出版过程及其对公共卫生的影响。通过审查各种健康传播利益相关者的观点，该研究旨在确定现有问题并提出潜在解决方案。
■这项研究采用了混合方法，包括以133个标准对846条新闻进行基线内容分析，包括官僚在内的78名参与者的定量研究，学者,记者,和健康协会成员，和15次深入访谈以获得全面的见解。
■内容分析显示，23.2%的分析新闻文章缺乏可靠的来源，而63%的人没有提到作者的名字。96.2％的受访者表示，不准确的健康新闻对公众健康构成风险，强调迫切需要标准化的报告做法。大多数（90.9％）指出媒体是信息传播的主要催化剂，93.5%的人认为守门人是获取准确信息的障碍。侵蚀对媒体的信任，在不道德的做法的推动下，损害媒体信誉和有效的公共卫生干预措施。
■该研究强调了公共机构之间合作方法的必要性，学术界,和媒体,注重责任,regulation,和对信息的制裁。该研究主张采取平衡的方法，在利益相关者驱动的框架内优先考虑健康权利和新闻自由，强调仅靠立法不能充分增强数字信息生态系统。
■这项研究采用了混合方法，包括以133个标准对846条新闻进行基线内容分析，包括官僚在内的78名参与者的定量研究，学者,记者,和健康协会成员，和15次深入访谈以获得全面的见解。
■内容分析显示，23.2%的分析新闻文章缺乏可靠的来源，而63%的人没有提到作者的名字。96.2％的受访者表示，不准确的健康新闻对公众健康构成风险，强调迫切需要标准化的报告做法。大多数（90.9％）指出媒体是信息传播的主要催化剂，93.5%的人认为守门人是获取准确信息的障碍。侵蚀对媒体的信任，在不道德的做法的推动下，损害媒体信誉和有效的公共卫生干预措施。
■该研究强调了公共机构之间合作方法的必要性，学术界,和媒体,注重责任,regulation,和对信息的制裁。该研究主张采取平衡的方法，在利益相关者驱动的框架内优先考虑健康权利和新闻自由，强调仅靠立法不能充分增强数字信息生态系统。
