UNASSIGNED: The research uses a mixed-methods approach, including baseline content analysis of 846 news by 133 criteria, quantitative research with 78 participants encompassing bureaucrats, academics, journalists, and health association members, and 15 in-depth interviews for comprehensive insights.
UNASSIGNED: The content analysis indicated that 23.2% of the analyzed news articles lacked credible sources, while 63% did not mention the author\'s name. A striking 96.2% of respondents stated that inaccurate health news poses a risk to public health, emphasizing the urgent need for standardized reporting practices. The majority (90.9%) pinpointed the media as the primary catalysts for infodemic spread, with 93.5% citing gatekeepers as barriers to accurate information. Eroding trust in media, fueled by unethical practices, harms both media credibility and effective public health interventions.
UNASSIGNED: The study underscores the necessity for a collaborative approach among public institutions, academia, and media, focusing on responsibility, regulation, and sanctions against the infodemic. The research advocates for a balanced approach that prioritizes health rights and press freedom within a stakeholder-driven framework, highlighting that legislation alone cannot fully enhance the digital information ecosystem.
■这项研究采用了混合方法,包括以133个标准对846条新闻进行基线内容分析,包括官僚在内的78名参与者的定量研究,学者,记者,和健康协会成员,和15次深入访谈以获得全面的见解。
■内容分析显示,23.2%的分析新闻文章缺乏可靠的来源,而63%的人没有提到作者的名字。96.2%的受访者表示,不准确的健康新闻对公众健康构成风险,强调迫切需要标准化的报告做法。大多数(90.9%)指出媒体是信息传播的主要催化剂,93.5%的人认为守门人是获取准确信息的障碍。侵蚀对媒体的信任,在不道德的做法的推动下,损害媒体信誉和有效的公共卫生干预措施。
■该研究强调了公共机构之间合作方法的必要性,学术界,和媒体,注重责任,regulation,和对信息的制裁。该研究主张采取平衡的方法,在利益相关者驱动的框架内优先考虑健康权利和新闻自由,强调仅靠立法不能充分增强数字信息生态系统。