PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
As of this writing, there have been approximately 24 randomized controlled trial publications, 32 meta-analyses, and 85 registries comparing intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) or optical coherence tomography (OCT) versus angiography-guided drug-eluting stent implantation (or IVUS versus OCT guidance). Although in specific clinical scenarios IVUS or OCT may be preferred, in most drug-eluting stent implantation procedures, either intravascular ultrasound or OCT can be used safely, efficiently, effectively, and interchangeably and will improve patient outcomes compared with stent implantation procedures performed just with angiography guidance.
摘要：
在撰写本文时，大约有24个随机对照试验出版物，32荟萃分析，和85个记录比较血管内超声(IVUS)或光学相干断层扫描(OCT)与血管造影引导的药物洗脱支架植入(或IVUS与OCT引导)。尽管在特定的临床情况下，IVUS或OCT可能是首选，在大多数药物洗脱支架植入手术中，血管内超声或OCT均可安全使用，高效,有效地,与仅在血管造影指导下进行的支架植入术相比，可互换使用，并将改善患者的预后。
