关键词: DEMATEL Sine trigonometry academician decision-making fuzzy sets occupational health occupational safety psychosocial risk factors

来  源:   DOI:10.3233/WOR-240145

Abstract:
UNASSIGNED: In the realm of academia, psychosocial risk factors play a pivotal role, exerting considerable influence on the well-being and performance of scholars. Factors such as excessive workloads, unrelenting performance expectations, time constraints, and competitive atmospheres can detrimentally affect their health and overall quality of life. Moreover, issues like social isolation, work-life imbalance, and academic anxiety further compound these challenges, impeding academic progress and success.
UNASSIGNED: Thus, it is imperative to identify, mitigate, and manage psychosocial risk factors effectively to foster a conducive academic environment conducive to productivity and achievement.
UNASSIGNED: This study employs a novel approach, integrating expert opinions and utilizing sine trigonometry Pythagorean fuzzy numbers to ascertain the degrees of importance and rank psychosocial risk factors through the DEMATEL method. This methodology presents a unique contribution to existing literature, offering fresh insights into this critical area of study.
UNASSIGNED: Evaluation of 25 factors reveals burnout, job dissatisfaction, precarious working conditions, lack of trust, unfair treatment, job insecurity, and limited developmental opportunities as primary concerns, underscoring the multifaceted nature of these challenges.
UNASSIGNED: In the occupational sphere, active participation from all stakeholders in addressing psychosocial risks is paramount for effective problem resolution. It is incumbent upon parties involved to discharge their duties, foster collaboration, enhance working conditions, ensure equity, and facilitate avenues for professional growth. Each identified risk factor addressed and preempted translates into a tangible reduction in workplace accidents and occupational ailments, underscoring the tangible benefits of proactive risk management.
摘要:
在学术界,社会心理危险因素起着举足轻重的作用,对学者的福祉和绩效产生相当大的影响。过多的工作负载等因素,坚持不懈的业绩预期,时间限制,竞争气氛会对他们的健康和整体生活质量产生不利影响。此外,社会孤立等问题,工作与生活的不平衡,学术焦虑进一步加剧了这些挑战,阻碍学术进步和成功。
因此,必须识别,缓解,并有效管理心理社会风险因素,以营造有利于生产力和成就的有利学术环境。
这项研究采用了一种新颖的方法,整合专家意见,利用正弦三角毕达哥拉斯模糊数来确定重要程度,并通过DEMATEL方法对心理社会风险因素进行排名。这种方法对现有文献提出了独特的贡献,为这个关键的研究领域提供新的见解。
对25个因素的评估揭示了职业倦怠,工作不满意,不稳定的工作条件,缺乏信任,不公平的待遇,工作不安全感,和有限的发展机会是首要问题,强调这些挑战的多面性。
在职业领域,所有利益相关者积极参与解决心理社会风险对于有效解决问题至关重要。有关各方有责任履行职责,促进合作,改善工作条件,确保公平,并促进专业成长的途径。解决和预防的每个已确定的风险因素都可以切实减少工作场所事故和职业疾病,强调主动风险管理的实际好处。
公众号