PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
OBJECTIVE: to analyze the validity evidence of the internal structure of the Risk Self-Medication Questionnaire Focused on Health Literacy.
METHODS: a psychometric study with 499 adults. The internal structure was assessed with exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis to prove the adjustment. Internal consistency was measured by composite reliability and McDonald\'s omega coefficient (ω).
RESULTS: the parameters revealed a model of 35 items distributed across four factors, explaining 56% of the total variance, with factor loadings ranging from 0.31 to 0.85 and adequate communalities. Accuracy (0.79CONCLUSIONS: an instrument was obtained with good evidence of structural validity for measuring self-medication.
METHODS: a psychometric study with 499 adults. The internal structure was assessed with exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis to prove the adjustment. Internal consistency was measured by composite reliability and McDonald\'s omega coefficient (ω).
RESULTS: the parameters revealed a model of 35 items distributed across four factors, explaining 56% of the total variance, with factor loadings ranging from 0.31 to 0.85 and adequate communalities. Accuracy (0.79
摘要：
目的：分析关注健康素养的风险自我用药问卷内部结构的有效性证据。
方法：一项对499名成年人进行的心理测量研究。通过探索性和验证性因子分析评估内部结构以证明调整。内部一致性是通过复合可靠性和麦克唐纳欧米茄系数(ω)来衡量的。
结果：参数揭示了分布在四个因素中的35个项目的模型，解释总方差的56%，要素负荷从0.31到0.85不等，社区充足。精度（0.79结论：获得了一种具有良好结构有效性的测量自我药物的工具。
方法：一项对499名成年人进行的心理测量研究。通过探索性和验证性因子分析评估内部结构以证明调整。内部一致性是通过复合可靠性和麦克唐纳欧米茄系数(ω)来衡量的。
结果：参数揭示了分布在四个因素中的35个项目的模型，解释总方差的56%，要素负荷从0.31到0.85不等，社区充足。精度（0.79
