UNASSIGNED: The approach involved conducting the stages of end-user engagement and pretesting together during a public involvement event. A hybrid approach involving a focus group with breakout interviews was employed. Feedback from contributors informed the evolution of the survey instrument.
UNASSIGNED: Changes to the survey instrument were organized into four categories: attribute modifications; choice task presentation and understanding; information presentation, clarity and content; and best-best scaling presentation. The hybrid approach facilitated group brainstorming while still allowing the researcher to assess the feasibility of choice tasks in an interview setting. However, greater individual exploration and the opportunity to trial iterative improvements across waves was not feasible with this approach.
UNASSIGNED: Involvement of the research advisory group resulted in a more person-centered survey design. In a context constrained by time and budget, and with consideration of the capacity and vulnerability of the target population, the approach taken was a feasible and pragmatic mechanism for improving the design of a SP survey.
■该方法涉及在公众参与活动期间进行最终用户参与和预先测试的阶段。采用了一种混合方法,该方法涉及一个具有突破性访谈的焦点小组。来自贡献者的反馈告知了调查工具的演变。
■对测量工具的更改分为四类:属性修改;选择任务的演示和理解;信息演示,清晰度和内容;以及最佳-最佳缩放演示。混合方法促进了小组头脑风暴,同时仍允许研究人员在面试环境中评估选择任务的可行性。然而,通过这种方法,更多的个体探索和尝试跨波迭代改进的机会是不可行的.
■研究咨询小组的参与导致了更加以人为本的调查设计。在受时间和预算限制的情况下,并考虑到目标人群的能力和脆弱性,所采取的方法是改进SP调查设计的可行和务实的机制。