UNASSIGNED: A total of 322 elite athletes (120 ice hockey, 165 other team sports, 37 closed-skill sports) participated in this study. Each athlete performed a tapping task, a visuo-verbal speed-reading task, and both tasks simultaneously. All ice hockey athletes performed additional cognitive tests assessing processing speed, spatial working memory, sustained attention, two choice reaction time, and motor inhibition.
UNASSIGNED: The results of paired-sample t-tests confirmed significant dual-task costs for all sport groups (p < 0.001). Single-task performance and dual-task costs correlated weakly in a positive direction. A one-way ANOVA revealed significantly greater costs in closed-skill sports athletes than in ice hockey and other sports athletes. No significant differences in dual-task costs were found between teams of differing expertise levels. Lastly, no significant regression model was found to predict dual-task costs from cognitive test performance.
UNASSIGNED: Our study suggests that this novel dual-task paradigm was successful in inducing dual-task costs for all elite athletes. Since it distinguishes between closed-skill and open-skill sports athletes, it might be a valuable diagnostic tool for performance and for talent development of open-skill athletes. Dual-task costs could not be relevantly predicted via cognitive performance measures, questioning cognitive resource theories as an explanation for dual-task costs.
■共有322名精英运动员(120名冰球运动员,165其他团队运动,37项封闭式技能运动)参加了这项研究。每个运动员都执行了攻丝任务,视觉语言速读任务,两个任务同时进行。所有冰球运动员都进行了额外的认知测试,评估处理速度,空间工作记忆,持续关注,两种选择反应时间,和运动抑制。
■配对样本t检验的结果证实了所有运动组的显着双重任务成本(p<0.001)。单任务绩效和双任务成本在积极方向上的相关性较弱。单向方差分析显示,封闭技能运动运动员的成本明显高于冰球和其他运动运动员。在不同专业知识水平的团队之间,双重任务成本没有显着差异。最后,没有发现显著的回归模型来预测认知测试表现的双重任务成本。
■我们的研究表明,这种新颖的双任务范式成功地诱导了所有精英运动员的双任务成本。由于它区分了封闭技能和开放技能的运动运动员,它可能是一个有价值的诊断工具,表现和人才发展的开放技能的运动员。双重任务成本不能通过认知绩效指标来相关地预测,质疑认知资源理论对双重任务成本的解释。