METHODS: Relying on a tertiary-care database, prostate cancer patients undergoing RP between January 2014 and December 2021 were stratified according to their combination of pT stage and ISUP grade in RP specimens (pT2 ISUP4/5 vs. pT3/4 ISUP2 vs. pT3/4 ISUP3). As Active Surveillance is recommended in ISUP1, these patients were excluded. Moreover, patients with pT2 ISUP2/3 are known for their good prognosis and pT3/4 ISUP4/5 patients for their poor prognosis. Therefore, these patients were also excluded from analyses. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses and multivariable Cox regression models addressed BCR after RP.
RESULTS: Of 215 RP patients, 29 (13%) exhibited pT2 ISUP4/5 vs. 122 (57%) pT3/4 ISUP2 vs. 64 (30%) pT3/4 ISUP3 pathology. In survival analyses, 3-year BCR-free survival rates were 95% in pT2 ISUP4/5 vs. 88% in pT3/4 ISUP2 vs. 65% in pT3/4 ISUP3 patients (P < 0.001). In multivariable Cox regression models addressing BCR, pT3/4 ISUP3 pathology was associated with higher BCR rate relative to pT2 ISUP4/5 pathology (hazard ratio 3.42, 95% confidence interval 1.07-10.94; P = 0.039), but not pT3/4 ISUP2 pathology (P = 0.6).
CONCLUSIONS: Compared to prostate cancer patients with pT2 ISUP4/5 pathology, the combination of pT3/4 ISUP3 pathology is associated with higher risk of BCR after RP. In consequence, patients with pT3/4 ISUP3 pathology should be considered for a closer postoperative follow-up.
方法:依靠三级护理数据库,2014年1月至2021年12月期间接受RP的前列腺癌患者根据RP标本中pT分期和ISUP分级的组合进行分层(pT2ISUP4/5vs.pT3/4ISUP2vs.pT3/4ISUP3)。由于ISUP1中建议进行主动监测,因此排除了这些患者。此外,pT2ISUP2/3患者预后良好,pT3/4ISUP4/5患者预后不良.因此,这些患者也被排除在分析之外.Kaplan-Meier生存分析和多变量Cox回归模型解决了RP后BCR。
结果:在215例RP患者中,29(13%)显示pT2ISUP4/5与122(57%)pT3/4ISUP2与64(30%)pT3/4ISUP3病理。在生存分析中,pT2ISUP4/5的3年无BCR生存率为95%。88%的pT3/4ISUP2与在pT3/4ISUP3患者中为65%(P<0.001)。在解决BCR的多变量Cox回归模型中,相对于pT2ISUP4/5病理学,pT3/4ISUP3病理学与较高的BCR率相关(风险比3.42,95%置信区间1.07-10.94;P=0.039),而不是pT3/4ISUP2病理(P=0.6)。
结论:与pT2ISUP4/5病理的前列腺癌患者相比,pT3/4ISUP3病理的组合与RP后BCR的高风险相关。因此,有pT3/4ISUP3病理的患者应考虑进行更密切的术后随访.