PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
OBJECTIVE: Working in a healthcare setting is associated with high levels of stress and burnout syndrome. Work-related quality of life (WRQoL) remains insufficiently evaluated among physicians. The aim of this study is to assess the WRQoL among physicians of interventional, non-interventional, and diagnostic specialties in Poland.
METHODS: Standardized and anonymous WRQoL questionnaires have been filled in by 257 physicians working in Silesia, Poland. After the removal of missing data, 246 individuals were stratified in terms of specialties into the appropriate categories, including interventional, non-interventional, and diagnostics. These categories were compared using the following subscales: general well-being (GWB), home-work interface (HWI), job and career satisfaction (JCS), control at work (CAW), working conditions (WCS), and stress at work (SAW).
RESULTS: Out of 246 individuals, 132 were women (53.7%) and 112 (45.5%) were men. There were no differences in terms of WRQoL scores (p = 0.220) and subscales GWB (p = 0.148), HWI (p = 0.368), JCS (p = 0.117), CAW (p = 0.224), WCS (p = 0.609), SAW (p = 0.472) between interventional, non-interventional, and diagnostic specialties. The group of young doctors (age ≤ 30 years) had higher JCS scores than the older ones (mean score [SD], 22.7 [3.98] vs. 21 [4.6]; p = 0.013). Physicians who were not working in hospital had higher WRQoL score than respondents working in hospital (p = 0.061), with significant differences in terms of GWB (mean score [SD], 20.3 [4.93] vs. 22.8 [3.2], p = 0.014), HWI (mean score [SD], 9.1 [=2.65] vs. 10.6 [2.73], p = 0.011), and WCS (mean score [SD], 9.5 [2.61] vs. 10.8 [2.54], p = 0.035).
CONCLUSIONS: There were no differences considering overall WRQoL between analyzed groups stratified according to specialty. However, we disclosed a significant association between the respondent\'s WRQoL and age as well as place of work.
METHODS: Standardized and anonymous WRQoL questionnaires have been filled in by 257 physicians working in Silesia, Poland. After the removal of missing data, 246 individuals were stratified in terms of specialties into the appropriate categories, including interventional, non-interventional, and diagnostics. These categories were compared using the following subscales: general well-being (GWB), home-work interface (HWI), job and career satisfaction (JCS), control at work (CAW), working conditions (WCS), and stress at work (SAW).
RESULTS: Out of 246 individuals, 132 were women (53.7%) and 112 (45.5%) were men. There were no differences in terms of WRQoL scores (p = 0.220) and subscales GWB (p = 0.148), HWI (p = 0.368), JCS (p = 0.117), CAW (p = 0.224), WCS (p = 0.609), SAW (p = 0.472) between interventional, non-interventional, and diagnostic specialties. The group of young doctors (age ≤ 30 years) had higher JCS scores than the older ones (mean score [SD], 22.7 [3.98] vs. 21 [4.6]; p = 0.013). Physicians who were not working in hospital had higher WRQoL score than respondents working in hospital (p = 0.061), with significant differences in terms of GWB (mean score [SD], 20.3 [4.93] vs. 22.8 [3.2], p = 0.014), HWI (mean score [SD], 9.1 [=2.65] vs. 10.6 [2.73], p = 0.011), and WCS (mean score [SD], 9.5 [2.61] vs. 10.8 [2.54], p = 0.035).
CONCLUSIONS: There were no differences considering overall WRQoL between analyzed groups stratified according to specialty. However, we disclosed a significant association between the respondent\'s WRQoL and age as well as place of work.
摘要：
目的：在医疗保健环境中工作与高水平的压力和倦怠综合征有关。与工作相关的生活质量（WRQoL）在医生中仍未得到充分评估。这项研究的目的是评估介入医生之间的WRQoL，非干预性，和波兰的诊断专业。
方法：在西里西亚工作的257名医生填写了标准化和匿名的WRQoL问卷，波兰。删除缺失的数据后，246个人根据专业分为适当的类别，包括介入,非干预性，和诊断。使用以下子量表对这些类别进行了比较：总体幸福感(GWB)，家庭工作接口(HWI)，工作和职业满意度(JCS)，工作控制(CAW)，工作条件(WCS),和工作压力（SAW）。
结果：在246个人中，132名女性（53.7%）和112名男性（45.5%）。WRQoL评分（p=0.220）和GWB分量表（p=0.148）没有差异，HWI（p=0.368），JCS（p=0.117），CAW（p=0.224），WCS（p=0.609），介入之间的SAW（p=0.472），非干预性，和诊断专业。年轻医生组（年龄≤30岁）的JCS得分高于年长医生组（平均得分[SD]，22.7[3.98]vs.21[4.6]；p=0.013）。不在医院工作的医生的WRQoL评分高于在医院工作的受访者（p=0.061），在GWB方面存在显著差异(平均得分[SD]，20.3[4.93]vs.22.8[3.2],p=0.014),HWI（平均得分[SD]，9.1[=2.65]vs.10.6[2.73]，p=0.011),和WCS(平均得分[SD]，9.5[2.61]vs.10.8[2.54]，p=0.035)。
结论：考虑到总体WRQoL，根据专业进行分层的分析组之间没有差异。然而,我们披露了受访者的WRQoL与年龄和工作地点之间的显著关联。
方法：在西里西亚工作的257名医生填写了标准化和匿名的WRQoL问卷，波兰。删除缺失的数据后，246个人根据专业分为适当的类别，包括介入,非干预性，和诊断。使用以下子量表对这些类别进行了比较：总体幸福感(GWB)，家庭工作接口(HWI)，工作和职业满意度(JCS)，工作控制(CAW)，工作条件(WCS),和工作压力（SAW）。
结果：在246个人中，132名女性（53.7%）和112名男性（45.5%）。WRQoL评分（p=0.220）和GWB分量表（p=0.148）没有差异，HWI（p=0.368），JCS（p=0.117），CAW（p=0.224），WCS（p=0.609），介入之间的SAW（p=0.472），非干预性，和诊断专业。年轻医生组（年龄≤30岁）的JCS得分高于年长医生组（平均得分[SD]，22.7[3.98]vs.21[4.6]；p=0.013）。不在医院工作的医生的WRQoL评分高于在医院工作的受访者（p=0.061），在GWB方面存在显著差异(平均得分[SD]，20.3[4.93]vs.22.8[3.2],p=0.014),HWI（平均得分[SD]，9.1[=2.65]vs.10.6[2.73]，p=0.011),和WCS(平均得分[SD]，9.5[2.61]vs.10.8[2.54]，p=0.035)。
结论：考虑到总体WRQoL，根据专业进行分层的分析组之间没有差异。然而,我们披露了受访者的WRQoL与年龄和工作地点之间的显著关联。
