Mesh : Humans Health Literacy / statistics & numerical data Female Male Emergency Service, Hospital / statistics & numerical data Adult Middle Aged Computer Literacy Surveys and Questionnaires Aged

来  源:   DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000038933   PDF(Pubmed)

Abstract:
In this research, it was aimed to evaluate the effect of emergency department history on health literacy level and the role of digital literacy. A total of 454 participants were subjected to survey including health literacy scale, the digital literacy scale, and the demographic information form. Participants were divided into 2 groups as emergency medicine service (EMS) history (n = 269) and no EMS history (n = 185) groups. Health literacy, attitude, cognitive, and total digital literacy level of EMS history group were significantly higher than no EMS history group (P < .05). Social dimension of digital literacy scale was significantly higher in no EMS history group (P < .05). In no EMS history group, health literacy was significantly correlated with attitude (r = 0.298; P < .01), technical (r = 0.157; P < .01), cognitive (r = 0.369; P < .01), social (r = -0.302; P < .01) dimensions, and total score of digital literacy (r = 0.213; P < .01). In EMS history group, health literacy was significantly correlated with attitude (r = 0.553; P < .01), technical (r = 0.488; P < .01), cognitive (r = 0.555; P < .01) dimensions, and total score of digital literacy (r = 0.514; P < .01). Digital literacy had significant and positive effect on health literacy for all participants (OR = 0.126; P < .01), no EMS history (OR = 0.059; P < .01) and EMS history group (OR = 0.191; P < .01). People\'s health literacy skills are positively impacted if they have ever received medical attention from EMS units, regardless of the reason. Furthermore, among those who have used emergency medical services in the past, the impact of digital literacy on health literacy is statistically substantially larger.
摘要:
在这项研究中,旨在评估急诊科病史对健康素养水平的影响以及数字素养的作用。共有454名参与者接受了包括健康素养量表在内的调查,数字素养量表,和人口统计信息表格。参与者分为2组,分别为急诊医学服务(EMS)病史(n=269)和无EMS病史(n=185)。健康素养,态度,认知,EMS病史组的总数字素养水平明显高于无EMS病史组(P<0.05)。无EMS病史组数字素养量表的社会维度显著高于对照组(P<0.05)。在无EMS历史记录组中,健康素养与态度显著相关(r=0.298;P<0.01),技术(r=0.157;P<0.01),认知(r=0.369;P<0.01),社会(r=-0.302;P<0.01)维度,数字素养总分(r=0.213;P<0.01)。在EMS历史记录组中,健康素养与态度显著相关(r=0.553;P<.01),技术(r=0.488;P<0.01),认知(r=0.555;P<0.01)维度,数字素养总分(r=0.514;P<0.01)。数字素养对所有参与者的健康素养都有显著的积极影响(OR=0.126;P<0.01)。无EMS病史(OR=0.059;P<.01)和EMS病史组(OR=0.191;P<.01)。如果人们曾经接受过EMS单位的医疗护理,他们的健康素养技能会受到积极影响,不管原因。此外,在过去使用过紧急医疗服务的人中,从统计上讲,数字素养对健康素养的影响要大得多。
公众号