PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
Subsequently to the publication of the above article, an interested reader drew to the authors\' attention that, for the scratch‑wound assay experiments shown in Fig. 3C, two images appeared to overlap [specifically, the \'0 h / Control\' and 0 h / OP‑B (5 μmol/l) data panels], albeit with different magnification and after a 180° rotation. The authors have examined their original data, and realize that an inadvertent error was made in assembling the images in the figure; specifically, the images of 5 and 10 μmol/l OP‑B treatment for 0 h were both misused. The corrected version of Fig. 3, showing all the correct data for Fig. 3C, is shown on the next page. Note that these errors did not affect the overall conclusions reported in the paper. All the authors agree with the publication of this corrigendum, and are grateful to the Editor of Oncology Reports for allowing them the opportunity to publish this. They also apologize to the readership for any inconvenience caused. [Oncology Reports 40: 1339‑1347, 2018; DOI: 10.3892/or.2018.6531].
摘要：
在上述文章发表之后，一位感兴趣的读者提请作者注意，用于如图所示的划痕试验实验。3C,两个图像似乎重叠[特别是，\'0h/Control\'和0h/OP‑B(5μmol/l)数据面板]，虽然不同的放大倍数和180°旋转后。作者检查了他们的原始数据，并意识到在组装图中的图像时犯了一个无意的错误；具体地说，5和10μmol/lOP‑B治疗0h的图像均被误用。图的更正版本。图3显示了所有正确的数据。3C,显示在下一页上。请注意，这些错误并不影响本文报告的总体结论。所有作者都同意本更正的出版，并感谢《肿瘤学报告》的编辑让他们有机会发表这篇文章。对于由此造成的不便，他们也向读者道歉。[肿瘤学报告40：1339-1347，2018；DOI：10.3892/or.2018.6531]。
