PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal neoplasm (GN) significantly impact the global cancer burden and mortality, necessitating early detection and treatment. Understanding the evolution and current state of research in this field is vital.
OBJECTIVE: To conducts a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of publications from 1984 to 2022 to elucidate the trends and hotspots in the GN risk assessment research, focusing on key contributors, institutions, and thematic evolution.
METHODS: This study conducted a bibliometric analysis of data from the Web of Science Core Collection database using the \"bibliometrix\" R package, VOSviewer, and CiteSpace. The analysis focused on the distribution of publications, contributions by institutions and countries, and trends in keywords. The methods included data synthesis, network analysis, and visualization of international collaboration networks.
RESULTS: This analysis of 1371 articles on GN risk assessment revealed a notable evolution in terms of research focus and collaboration. It highlights the United States\' critical role in advancing this field, with significant contributions from institutions such as Brigham and Women\'s Hospital and the National Cancer Institute. The last five years, substantial advancements have been made, representing nearly 45% of the examined literature. Publication rates have dramatically increased, from 20 articles in 2002 to 112 in 2022, reflecting intensified research efforts. This study underscores a growing trend toward interdisciplinary and international collaboration, with the Journal of Clinical Oncology standing out as a key publication outlet. This shift toward more comprehensive and collaborative research methods marks a significant step in addressing GN risks.
CONCLUSIONS: This study underscores advancements in GN risk assessment through genetic analyses and machine learning and reveals significant geographical disparities in research emphasis. This calls for enhanced global collaboration and integration of artificial intelligence to improve cancer prevention and treatment accuracy, ultimately enhancing worldwide patient care.
OBJECTIVE: To conducts a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of publications from 1984 to 2022 to elucidate the trends and hotspots in the GN risk assessment research, focusing on key contributors, institutions, and thematic evolution.
METHODS: This study conducted a bibliometric analysis of data from the Web of Science Core Collection database using the \"bibliometrix\" R package, VOSviewer, and CiteSpace. The analysis focused on the distribution of publications, contributions by institutions and countries, and trends in keywords. The methods included data synthesis, network analysis, and visualization of international collaboration networks.
RESULTS: This analysis of 1371 articles on GN risk assessment revealed a notable evolution in terms of research focus and collaboration. It highlights the United States\' critical role in advancing this field, with significant contributions from institutions such as Brigham and Women\'s Hospital and the National Cancer Institute. The last five years, substantial advancements have been made, representing nearly 45% of the examined literature. Publication rates have dramatically increased, from 20 articles in 2002 to 112 in 2022, reflecting intensified research efforts. This study underscores a growing trend toward interdisciplinary and international collaboration, with the Journal of Clinical Oncology standing out as a key publication outlet. This shift toward more comprehensive and collaborative research methods marks a significant step in addressing GN risks.
CONCLUSIONS: This study underscores advancements in GN risk assessment through genetic analyses and machine learning and reveals significant geographical disparities in research emphasis. This calls for enhanced global collaboration and integration of artificial intelligence to improve cancer prevention and treatment accuracy, ultimately enhancing worldwide patient care.
摘要：
背景：胃肠道肿瘤（GN）显著影响全球癌症负担和死亡率，需要早期检测和治疗。了解该领域的发展和研究现状至关重要。
目的：对1984年至2022年的出版物进行全面的文献计量分析，以阐明GN风险评估研究的趋势和热点，专注于关键贡献者，机构,和主题演变。
方法：本研究使用“bibliometrix”R软件包对来自WebofScienceCoreCollection数据库的数据进行了文献计量分析，VOSviewer,和城市空间。分析的重点是出版物的分发,机构和国家的贡献，和关键字的趋势。这些方法包括数据综合，网络分析,和国际合作网络的可视化。
结果：对1371篇有关GN风险评估的文章的分析显示，在研究重点和合作方面有了显着的发展。它强调了美国在推进这一领域的关键作用，来自布莱根和妇女医院和国家癌症研究所等机构的重大贡献。过去五年,取得了实质性进展，占所检查文献的近45%。出版率急剧上升,从2002年的20篇文章到2022年的112篇文章，反映了研究工作的加强。这项研究强调了跨学科和国际合作的日益增长的趋势，“临床肿瘤学杂志”是一个重要的出版物。这种向更全面和协作研究方法的转变标志着解决GN风险的重要一步。
结论：这项研究强调了通过遗传分析和机器学习在GN风险评估方面的进步，并揭示了研究重点的显著地理差异。这要求加强全球协作和人工智能的整合，以提高癌症预防和治疗的准确性。最终加强全球患者护理。
目的：对1984年至2022年的出版物进行全面的文献计量分析，以阐明GN风险评估研究的趋势和热点，专注于关键贡献者，机构,和主题演变。
方法：本研究使用“bibliometrix”R软件包对来自WebofScienceCoreCollection数据库的数据进行了文献计量分析，VOSviewer,和城市空间。分析的重点是出版物的分发,机构和国家的贡献，和关键字的趋势。这些方法包括数据综合，网络分析,和国际合作网络的可视化。
结果：对1371篇有关GN风险评估的文章的分析显示，在研究重点和合作方面有了显着的发展。它强调了美国在推进这一领域的关键作用，来自布莱根和妇女医院和国家癌症研究所等机构的重大贡献。过去五年,取得了实质性进展，占所检查文献的近45%。出版率急剧上升,从2002年的20篇文章到2022年的112篇文章，反映了研究工作的加强。这项研究强调了跨学科和国际合作的日益增长的趋势，“临床肿瘤学杂志”是一个重要的出版物。这种向更全面和协作研究方法的转变标志着解决GN风险的重要一步。
结论：这项研究强调了通过遗传分析和机器学习在GN风险评估方面的进步，并揭示了研究重点的显著地理差异。这要求加强全球协作和人工智能的整合，以提高癌症预防和治疗的准确性。最终加强全球患者护理。
