METHODS: Thirty-three older preschool children (14 were diagnosed with ADHD, mean age: 66.21 ± 5.48 months; 19 demonstrated typical development, mean age: 61.16 ± 8.11 months) were enrolled and underwent comprehensive medical and developmental evaluations. All participants underwent 2 versions of neuropsychological measures, including the K-CPT, Second Edition (K-CPT 2) and the ΣCOG, within a short interval.
RESULTS: The study indicated the omissions and response time scores measured in this novel system correlated with clinical measurement of the behavioral scales in all participants and in the group with ADHD; additionally, associations with the traditional K-CPT 2 were observed in commissions and response time scores. Furthermore, this system provided a within-task behavioral analysis that identified the group differences in the specific trial regarding omission and commission errors.
CONCLUSIONS: This innovative system is clinically feasible and can be further used as an alternative to the K-CPT 2 especially in research by revealing within-task event-related information analysis.
方法:33名年龄较大的学龄前儿童(14名被诊断为ADHD,平均年龄:66.21±5.48个月;19个表现出典型的发育,平均年龄:61.16±8.11个月),并接受了全面的医学和发育评估。所有参与者都接受了两种版本的神经心理学测量,包括K-CPT,第二版(K-CPT2)和ΣCOG,在很短的时间间隔内。
结果:该研究表明,在该新颖系统中测量的遗漏和响应时间得分与所有参与者和ADHD组的行为量表的临床测量相关;此外,与传统K-CPT2的相关性在佣金和响应时间评分中观察到.此外,该系统提供了任务内行为分析,确定了特定试验中关于遗漏和委托错误的群体差异.
结论:该创新系统在临床上是可行的,可以进一步用作K-CPT2的替代方案,特别是在研究中,通过揭示任务内事件相关的信息分析。