Abstract：
Singh asserts that the parent-child relationship engenders a moral responsibility for the newborn. Simultaneously, he contends, drawing on the argument from potentiality, that the fetal stage of human development does not establish the parent-child relationship. Consequently, within Singh\'s proposed relational framework, moral responsibility for the developing fetus does not manifest. Thus, Singh advocates for abortion, citing the absence of moral responsibilities arising for the pregnant woman for the fetus. In this article, I critique Singh\'s argument from potentiality, identifying flaws and highlight the incoherence of the argument pertaining to the parent-child relationship.
摘要：
辛格断言，亲子关系对新生儿产生了道德责任。同时,他争辩说,从潜力中汲取论点，人类发育的胎儿阶段没有建立亲子关系。因此,在辛格提出的关系框架中，对发育中的胎儿的道德责任没有表现出来。因此，辛格提倡堕胎,理由是孕妇对胎儿缺乏道德责任。在这篇文章中,我从潜力中批评辛格的论点，识别缺陷并强调与亲子关系有关的论点的不一致性。
