METHODS: The participants were seven primiparous women who were within 1 year after childbirth, recruited through purposive and snowball sampling from an online parenting community. The data were collected through in-depth interviews from November 14 to 28, 2022. Participants were interviewed face-to-face or via phone or online platform, according to their choice. Colaizzi\'s phenomenological qualitative research method was applied to analyze the meaning of the participants\' experience.
RESULTS: Five theme clusters and fourteen themes were identified from the data. The five theme clusters are as follows: (1) Shortcomings of the childbirth and postpartum care system I learned through my experience; (2) Government policies focusing on childbirth and child-rearing rather than postpartum recovery; (3) Driving force of postpartum recovery: Shared childbirth process; (4) Childcare on my own; and (5) Conflicted between being a stay-at-home mom and a working mom under inadequate maternity protection policies.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite postpartum support from the government that was perceived as inadequate, first-time mothers regained confidence and motivation for parenting with the help of family, peers, and social networks. First-time mothers need support from professionals and reliable online communities for postpartum recovery and parenting.
方法:参与者是分娩后1年内的7名初产妇,通过来自在线育儿社区的目的性和滚雪球抽样招募。数据是通过2022年11月14日至28日的深入访谈收集的。参与者接受了面对面或通过电话或在线平台的采访,根据他们的选择。Colaizzi的现象学定性研究方法被用来分析参与者体验的含义。
结果:从数据中确定了五个主题集群和十四个主题。五个主题组如下:(1)我通过经验了解到的分娩和产后护理系统的缺点;(2)政府政策侧重于分娩和育儿而不是产后恢复;(3)产后恢复的驱动力:共享分娩过程;(4)我自己的育儿;(5)在生育保护政策不足的情况下,全职妈妈和工作妈妈之间的冲突。
结论:尽管人们认为政府的产后支持不足,第一次做母亲的人在家庭的帮助下恢复了为人父母的信心和动力,同行,和社交网络。初次母亲需要专业人士和可靠的在线社区的支持,以进行产后恢复和育儿。