PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
OBJECTIVE: to map the content and features of mobile applications on the management of Diabetes Mellitus and their usability on the main operating systems.
METHODS: benchmarking research. The mapping of apps, content, and resources on the Play Store and App Store platforms was based on an adaptation of the Joanna Briggs Institute\'s scoping review framework. For the usability analysis, the apps were tested for two weeks and the System Usability Scale instrument was used, with scores between 50-67 points being considered borderline, between 68-84, products with acceptable usability and above 85, excellent user acceptance and, for the analysis, descriptive statistics.
RESULTS: the most prevalent contents were capillary blood glucose management, diet, oral drug therapy, and insulin therapy. As for resources, diaries and graphs were the most common. With regard to usability, two apps were considered to have excellent usability; 34, products with acceptable usability; 29, the resource may have some flaws but still has acceptable usability standards and 6, with flaws and no usability conditions.
CONCLUSIONS: the content and resources of mobile applications address the fundamental points for managing Diabetes Mellitus with user-friendly resources, with usability acceptable to users and have the potential to assist in the management of Diabetes Mellitus in patients\' daily lives.
METHODS: benchmarking research. The mapping of apps, content, and resources on the Play Store and App Store platforms was based on an adaptation of the Joanna Briggs Institute\'s scoping review framework. For the usability analysis, the apps were tested for two weeks and the System Usability Scale instrument was used, with scores between 50-67 points being considered borderline, between 68-84, products with acceptable usability and above 85, excellent user acceptance and, for the analysis, descriptive statistics.
RESULTS: the most prevalent contents were capillary blood glucose management, diet, oral drug therapy, and insulin therapy. As for resources, diaries and graphs were the most common. With regard to usability, two apps were considered to have excellent usability; 34, products with acceptable usability; 29, the resource may have some flaws but still has acceptable usability standards and 6, with flaws and no usability conditions.
CONCLUSIONS: the content and resources of mobile applications address the fundamental points for managing Diabetes Mellitus with user-friendly resources, with usability acceptable to users and have the potential to assist in the management of Diabetes Mellitus in patients\' daily lives.
摘要：
目的：映射有关糖尿病管理的移动应用程序的内容和功能及其在主要操作系统上的可用性。
方法：基准研究。应用程序的映射，内容,Play商店和AppStore平台上的资源基于对JoannaBriggsInstitute的范围审查框架的改编。对于可用性分析，对应用程序进行了两周的测试，并使用了系统可用性量表仪器，50-67分之间的分数被认为是边界线，68-84之间，具有可接受的可用性和85以上的产品，优秀的用户接受度和，为了分析，描述性统计。
结果：最普遍的内容是毛细血管血糖管理，饮食，口服药物治疗,和胰岛素治疗。至于资源,日记和图表是最常见的。关于可用性，两个应用程序被认为具有出色的可用性;34，具有可接受的可用性的产品;29，资源可能有一些缺陷，但仍然具有可接受的可用性标准;6，有缺陷，没有可用性条件。
结论：移动应用程序的内容和资源解决了使用用户友好资源管理糖尿病的基本点，具有用户可接受的可用性，并有可能在患者的日常生活中协助管理糖尿病。
方法：基准研究。应用程序的映射，内容,Play商店和AppStore平台上的资源基于对JoannaBriggsInstitute的范围审查框架的改编。对于可用性分析，对应用程序进行了两周的测试，并使用了系统可用性量表仪器，50-67分之间的分数被认为是边界线，68-84之间，具有可接受的可用性和85以上的产品，优秀的用户接受度和，为了分析，描述性统计。
结果：最普遍的内容是毛细血管血糖管理，饮食，口服药物治疗,和胰岛素治疗。至于资源,日记和图表是最常见的。关于可用性，两个应用程序被认为具有出色的可用性;34，具有可接受的可用性的产品;29，资源可能有一些缺陷，但仍然具有可接受的可用性标准;6，有缺陷，没有可用性条件。
结论：移动应用程序的内容和资源解决了使用用户友好资源管理糖尿病的基本点，具有用户可接受的可用性，并有可能在患者的日常生活中协助管理糖尿病。
