METHODS: A systematic search of five academic databases - CINAHL, ASSIA, PsycINFO, Embase and Medline - was completed in December 2020 and updated in February 2022. The review was guided by the Whittemore and Knafl (2005) framework for integrative reviews. A total of 6,255 studies were returned and screened by title and abstract. A full-text screening of nine (n = 9) studies was conducted.
RESULTS: No study met the inclusion criteria for the clinical efficacy of digital/e-health interventions in a prison setting. Subsequently, a review of the literature that made it to the full-text review stage was conducted, and gaps in the literature were identified to inform policy, practice and future research.
CONCLUSIONS: To the best of the authors\' knowledge, this is the first integrative review conducted on the efficacy of digital/e-health interventions for mental ill-health in prison settings.
方法:对五个学术数据库的系统搜索-CINAHL,ASSIA,PsycINFO,Embase和Medline-于2020年12月完成,并于2022年2月更新。审查以Whittemore和Knafl(2005)综合审查框架为指导。总共返回了6,255项研究,并通过标题和摘要进行了筛选。对9项(n=9)研究进行了全文筛选。
结果:没有一项研究符合监狱环境中数字/电子健康干预措施临床疗效的纳入标准。随后,对进入全文审查阶段的文献进行了审查,并确定了文献中的空白来为政策提供信息,实践和未来的研究。
结论:据作者所知,这是对数字/电子健康干预措施对监狱环境中精神疾病健康的有效性进行的首次综合审查。