PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
UNASSIGNED: Medical literature revealed that there is a lack of information about the opinions of medical interns and residents about curricula provided to them during their undergraduate programs, either in a group of detached subjects or an incorporated and efficacious topic (ie, pathology).
UNASSIGNED: To assess and compare the interns\' and residents\' perspectives towards Pathology as a subject. To recognize their opinions toward the relevance and application of Pathology while practicing clinically.
UNASSIGNED: This study was a cross-sectional online, self-administered questionnaire targeting interns and residents. The questionnaire consisted of 30 questions, enquiring about the demographic data, subject strength, teaching duration, interest in the subject, and usefulness of Pathology as a subject in clinical practice.
UNASSIGNED: Overall, 103 participants completed the survey. The female and male percentage was 59.2% and 40.8% respectively. 86.4% of participants were interns, while 13.6% were residents. 87% of participants agreed that applying pathology during clinical practice is a skill that should be strengthened in the early stages of preclinical education of Medicine. A modest percentage believed that a practitioner could efficiently treat the majority of patients with no need to know the specifics of the pathological mechanisms involved. Most of the participants believed that pathology courses helped them in making a differential diagnosis, analysis of normal and pathological constituents, and dissection and identification of structures.
UNASSIGNED: This study highlights the positive perceptions of Jordanian interns and residents toward pathology courses. It also demonstrates that participants prefer an active and dynamic educational model with an emphasis on better integration of pathology courses and clinical experiences that fit their needs in clinical practice. Thus, we recommend future studies to compare the competencies of interns and residents enrolled in the courses with integrated medical curricula, of pathology versus those who studied the conventional medical curricula of pathology, as well as to evaluate their perceptions of medical education.
UNASSIGNED: To assess and compare the interns\' and residents\' perspectives towards Pathology as a subject. To recognize their opinions toward the relevance and application of Pathology while practicing clinically.
UNASSIGNED: This study was a cross-sectional online, self-administered questionnaire targeting interns and residents. The questionnaire consisted of 30 questions, enquiring about the demographic data, subject strength, teaching duration, interest in the subject, and usefulness of Pathology as a subject in clinical practice.
UNASSIGNED: Overall, 103 participants completed the survey. The female and male percentage was 59.2% and 40.8% respectively. 86.4% of participants were interns, while 13.6% were residents. 87% of participants agreed that applying pathology during clinical practice is a skill that should be strengthened in the early stages of preclinical education of Medicine. A modest percentage believed that a practitioner could efficiently treat the majority of patients with no need to know the specifics of the pathological mechanisms involved. Most of the participants believed that pathology courses helped them in making a differential diagnosis, analysis of normal and pathological constituents, and dissection and identification of structures.
UNASSIGNED: This study highlights the positive perceptions of Jordanian interns and residents toward pathology courses. It also demonstrates that participants prefer an active and dynamic educational model with an emphasis on better integration of pathology courses and clinical experiences that fit their needs in clinical practice. Thus, we recommend future studies to compare the competencies of interns and residents enrolled in the courses with integrated medical curricula, of pathology versus those who studied the conventional medical curricula of pathology, as well as to evaluate their perceptions of medical education.
摘要：
■医学文献显示，缺乏关于医学实习生和住院医师对本科课程期间提供给他们的课程的意见的信息，无论是在一组独立的主题中，还是在一个整合和有效的主题中(即，病理学)。
■评估和比较实习生和居民对病理学的看法。在临床实践中认识到他们对病理学的相关性和应用的看法。
■这项研究是一项横向在线研究，针对实习生和居民的自我管理问卷。问卷由30个问题组成，询问人口统计数据，主体力量,教学持续时间，对主题的兴趣，以及病理学在临床实践中作为学科的有用性。
■总的来说，103名参与者完成了调查。女性和男性的百分比分别为59.2％和40.8％。86.4%的参与者是实习生，居民占13.6%。87％的参与者同意在临床实践中应用病理学是一项技能，应在医学临床前教育的早期阶段予以加强。适度的百分比认为从业者可以有效地治疗大多数患者，而无需了解所涉及的病理机制的细节。大多数参与者认为病理学课程有助于他们进行鉴别诊断，分析正常和病理成分，以及结构的解剖和鉴定。
■这项研究强调了约旦实习生和居民对病理学课程的积极看法。它还表明，参与者更喜欢积极和动态的教育模式，重点是更好地整合病理课程和临床经验，以满足他们在临床实践中的需求。因此，我们建议在未来的研究中，将参加课程的实习生和住院医师的能力与综合医学课程进行比较，病理学与研究病理学传统医学课程的人相比，以及评估他们对医学教育的看法。
■评估和比较实习生和居民对病理学的看法。在临床实践中认识到他们对病理学的相关性和应用的看法。
■这项研究是一项横向在线研究，针对实习生和居民的自我管理问卷。问卷由30个问题组成，询问人口统计数据，主体力量,教学持续时间，对主题的兴趣，以及病理学在临床实践中作为学科的有用性。
■总的来说，103名参与者完成了调查。女性和男性的百分比分别为59.2％和40.8％。86.4%的参与者是实习生，居民占13.6%。87％的参与者同意在临床实践中应用病理学是一项技能，应在医学临床前教育的早期阶段予以加强。适度的百分比认为从业者可以有效地治疗大多数患者，而无需了解所涉及的病理机制的细节。大多数参与者认为病理学课程有助于他们进行鉴别诊断，分析正常和病理成分，以及结构的解剖和鉴定。
■这项研究强调了约旦实习生和居民对病理学课程的积极看法。它还表明，参与者更喜欢积极和动态的教育模式，重点是更好地整合病理课程和临床经验，以满足他们在临床实践中的需求。因此，我们建议在未来的研究中，将参加课程的实习生和住院医师的能力与综合医学课程进行比较，病理学与研究病理学传统医学课程的人相比，以及评估他们对医学教育的看法。
