PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
Occupational accidents, despite continuous safety updates, are still a scourge in the occupational and forensic spheres, constituting, among other things, the subject of a large share of litigation. Demographic data can help to understand the areas where the application of health surveillance is lacking. This meta-analysis sets out to analyse data from studies on accidents at work, focusing on the correlation between the areas in which accidents occur and whether or not personal safety equipment is used, in relation to the different regulations in force. For the selection of the data, a systematic review was carried out according to the PRISMA guidelines, with the primary objective of identifying the trend of occupational accidents in specific geographical areas, which differ in terms of the attention paid to preventive aspects. The data we highlighted showed, regarding the type of accident, substantial differences between low-income countries and industrialised countries (stratified according to the Human Development Index) and, an overall indifference as to whether or not individual safety devices were used, revealing that, despite the continuous normative evolution in the field of safety at work, even today, the investigative data on the actual application of the regulations, during accidents at work, is underestimated and little researched.
摘要：
职业事故,尽管不断更新安全，仍然是职业和法医领域的祸害，构成，除其他外，诉讼的主体很大一部分。人口数据可以帮助了解缺乏健康监测应用的领域。这项荟萃分析旨在分析来自工作事故研究的数据，重点关注事故发生地区与是否使用个人安全设备之间的相关性，关于现行的不同条例。对于数据的选择，根据PRISMA指南进行了系统审查，主要目标是确定特定地理区域的职业事故趋势，在对预防方面的关注方面有所不同。我们强调的数据显示，关于事故的类型，低收入国家和工业化国家之间的巨大差异(根据人类发展指数分层)，对是否使用单独的安全装置完全漠不关心，揭示了这一点，尽管工作安全领域的规范不断发展，即使在今天,有关法规实际应用的调查数据，在工作事故中，被低估了，很少研究。
