METHODS: The subset of datasets from the 3 randomized controlled trials was created to examine differences in the BOSCC scores between intervention and control groups over the course of the interventions.
RESULTS: Based on 582 videos from 207 caregiver-child dyads, the BOSCC noted significant differences between intervention vs control groups in broad social communication skills within 2 of the 3 intervention models, which were longer in duration and focused on a broad range of developmental skills.
CONCLUSIONS: The BOSCC offers the potential to take a uniform measurement approach across different intervention models to capture the effect of intervention on general social communication skills but may not pick up the effects of some brief interventions targeting proximal outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Comparing Parent-Implemented Interventions for Toddlers With Autism Spectrum Disorders; https://www.
RESULTS: gov/; NCT00760812. Intensive Intervention for Toddlers With Autism (EARLY STEPS); https://www.
RESULTS: gov/; NCT00698997. Social and Communication Outcomes for Young Children With Autism; https://www.
RESULTS: gov/; NCT00953095.
方法:创建来自三个随机对照试验的数据集子集,以检查干预组和对照组在干预过程中的BOSCC评分差异。
结果:基于来自207个照顾者-儿童二元组的582个视频,BOSCC注意到干预措施与干预措施之间的显着差异对照组在三种干预模式中的两种中具有广泛的社会交往能力,这些干预模式持续时间更长,并且专注于广泛的发展技能。
结论:BOSCC有可能在不同的干预模型中采取统一的测量方法来捕捉干预对一般社会沟通技能的影响,但可能无法获得一些针对近端结局的简短干预的影响。