Abstract：
BACKGROUND: Community-partnered participatory research (CPPR) is a research approach that supports equitable collaboration of community and academic co-leaders in research and policy. Despite CPPR\'s 25-year history, infrastructure supporting community members in bidirectional learning has not been formalized.
OBJECTIVE: This paper describes processes and procedures using CPPR to plan conferences to develop community leadership training infrastructure.
METHODS: We utilized rapid ethnographic analysis to examine conference planning processes for community leadership in CPPR. Community and academic leaders in Los Angeles, New Orleans, and Chicago met weekly over two months to plan, given COVID-19, three Zoom conferences on a leadership training institute for CPPR, with planning for (1) community co-leadership in research and policy; (2) local and national CPPR programs; and (3) models for bidirectional training.
RESULTS: The planning process emphasized bidirectional learning for community and academic members for research and services/policy to benefit communities, within a Community Leadership Institute for Equity (C-LIFE) to promote equity and power sharing for community leaders. The planning process identified major themes of framing of C-LIFE conference planning goals, developing the conference structure, promoting equity and diversity, envisioning the future of CPPR, challenges, collaborations, future curriculum ideas for C-LIFE, evaluation and next-steps for Zoom conferences in November 2020.
CONCLUSIONS: It was feasible to use CPPR to plan Zoom conferences to promote community leadership training across multiple sites. Key planning themes included promoting equity, addressing structural racism, bidirectional learning and integrating community, academic, and policy priorities with community co-leaders as change agents.
OBJECTIVE: This paper describes processes and procedures using CPPR to plan conferences to develop community leadership training infrastructure.
METHODS: We utilized rapid ethnographic analysis to examine conference planning processes for community leadership in CPPR. Community and academic leaders in Los Angeles, New Orleans, and Chicago met weekly over two months to plan, given COVID-19, three Zoom conferences on a leadership training institute for CPPR, with planning for (1) community co-leadership in research and policy; (2) local and national CPPR programs; and (3) models for bidirectional training.
RESULTS: The planning process emphasized bidirectional learning for community and academic members for research and services/policy to benefit communities, within a Community Leadership Institute for Equity (C-LIFE) to promote equity and power sharing for community leaders. The planning process identified major themes of framing of C-LIFE conference planning goals, developing the conference structure, promoting equity and diversity, envisioning the future of CPPR, challenges, collaborations, future curriculum ideas for C-LIFE, evaluation and next-steps for Zoom conferences in November 2020.
CONCLUSIONS: It was feasible to use CPPR to plan Zoom conferences to promote community leadership training across multiple sites. Key planning themes included promoting equity, addressing structural racism, bidirectional learning and integrating community, academic, and policy priorities with community co-leaders as change agents.
摘要：
背景：社区伙伴参与式研究（CPPR）是一种研究方法，支持社区和学术共同领导者在研究和政策方面的公平合作。尽管CPPR已有25年的历史，支持社区成员进行双向学习的基础设施尚未形式化。
目的：本文描述了使用CPPR计划会议以开发社区领导力培训基础设施的过程和程序。
方法：我们利用快速人种学分析来检查CPPR社区领导的会议规划流程。洛杉矶的社区和学术领袖，新奥尔良,和芝加哥每周会面两个多月来计划，鉴于COVID-19，在CPPR领导力培训机构举行的三次Zoom会议，计划（1）研究和政策方面的社区共同领导；（2）地方和国家CPPR计划；（3）双向培训模型。
结果：计划过程强调社区和学术成员的双向学习，以进行研究和服务/政策，以造福社区，在社区领导公平研究所（C-LIFE）内，以促进社区领导人的公平和权力分享。规划过程确定了C-LIFE会议规划目标框架的主要主题，发展会议结构，促进公平和多样性，展望CPPR的未来，挑战,合作,C-LIFE未来的课程理念，2020年11月Zoom会议的评估和后续步骤。
结论：使用CPPR计划Zoom会议以促进跨多个站点的社区领导力培训是可行的。主要规划主题包括促进公平，解决结构性种族主义，双向学习和整合社区，学术,以及与社区共同领导人作为变革推动者的政策优先事项。
目的：本文描述了使用CPPR计划会议以开发社区领导力培训基础设施的过程和程序。
方法：我们利用快速人种学分析来检查CPPR社区领导的会议规划流程。洛杉矶的社区和学术领袖，新奥尔良,和芝加哥每周会面两个多月来计划，鉴于COVID-19，在CPPR领导力培训机构举行的三次Zoom会议，计划（1）研究和政策方面的社区共同领导；（2）地方和国家CPPR计划；（3）双向培训模型。
结果：计划过程强调社区和学术成员的双向学习，以进行研究和服务/政策，以造福社区，在社区领导公平研究所（C-LIFE）内，以促进社区领导人的公平和权力分享。规划过程确定了C-LIFE会议规划目标框架的主要主题，发展会议结构，促进公平和多样性，展望CPPR的未来，挑战,合作,C-LIFE未来的课程理念，2020年11月Zoom会议的评估和后续步骤。
结论：使用CPPR计划Zoom会议以促进跨多个站点的社区领导力培训是可行的。主要规划主题包括促进公平，解决结构性种族主义，双向学习和整合社区，学术,以及与社区共同领导人作为变革推动者的政策优先事项。
