Abstract：
Inspired by Giommoni\'s assessment of the Cunningham precursor control scholarship, we propose two concepts to help drug policy scholars think through the mechanisms that operate when market participants are faced with a change in precursor availability. The first is the concept of restrictive deterrence, that emphasizes risks mitigation strategies such as looking into changes in the frequency, methods, markets that may occur after different types of interventions. While restrictive deterrence is an improvement over current approaches in thinking through adaptations, it falls short in its narrower focus on the individual, rather than organizations or the market as a collective. The concept of resilience is then proposed as alternative that allows scholars to elaborate specific hypotheses and assess both organizations and markets based on their capacity to anticipate, cope, adapt and ultimately recover from disruptions. We finish by providing a reading of the Cunningham and colleagues precursor control papers with the resilience framework in mind, showing that many of the elements were already present in their work.
摘要：
受Giommoni对坎宁安前体控制奖学金的评估的启发，我们提出了两个概念，以帮助药物政策学者思考当市场参与者面临前体可用性变化时运作的机制。一是限制性威慑的概念,强调风险缓解策略，如调查频率的变化，方法,不同类型干预后可能出现的市场。虽然限制性威慑是对当前通过适应思考的方法的改进，它在对个人的狭隘关注方面不足，而不是组织或市场作为一个集体。然后，弹性的概念被提出作为替代方案，允许学者详细阐述具体的假设，并根据组织和市场的预测能力来评估，cope,适应并最终从中断中恢复。最后，我们阅读了坎宁安和同事们的前体对照论文，并考虑了韧性框架，表明许多元素已经存在于他们的工作中。
