METHODS: We administered an online survey to a purposive sample of 46 surgeons who perform MBS on children and adolescents. Survey questions explored practices prescribing GLP-1As in patients considering MBS, holding them prior to elective operations, and restarting them postoperatively following MBS. Responses were summarized with descriptive statistics and inductive content analysis.
RESULTS: There were 22 responses (48% response rate) representing 19 institutions. Most (86%) respondents do sometimes prescribe GLP-1As for patients considering MBS, but the specific indications vary. Practices for holding GLP-1As preoperatively also vary, from not at all to holding for 2 wk. Over half (55%) of respondents sometimes restart GLP-1As after MBS. Free-response themes included still-evolving preoperative utilization patterns, difficulty with access and insurance coverage, and a lack of data informing GLP-1A use in the pre and postoperative periods.
CONCLUSIONS: Given the increasing use of these medications for weight loss purposes, this substantial variation in practice highlights a need for further research to examine the safest and most effective use of GLP-1As in the pre and postoperative periods and for practice guidelines to standardize care pathways in pediatric bariatric contexts.
方法:我们对46名对儿童和青少年实施MBS的外科医生进行了一项有目的的在线调查。调查问题探索了在考虑MBS的患者中处方GLP-1As的做法,在选修行动之前拿着它们,并在MBS术后重新启动它们。通过描述性统计和归纳内容分析对反应进行总结。
结果:有22个响应(48%的响应率)代表19个机构。大多数(86%)受访者有时确实为考虑MBS的患者开GLP-1As,但具体的适应症各不相同。术前持有GLP-1As的做法也各不相同,从根本没有到坚持2周。超过一半(55%)的受访者有时会在MBS后重新启动GLP-1A。自由反应主题包括仍在发展的术前利用模式,难以进入和保险范围,并且缺乏在术前和术后期间使用GLP-1A的数据。
结论:鉴于这些药物用于减肥目的的使用越来越多,实践中的这种实质性差异凸显了需要进一步研究以检查GLP-1A在术前和术后期间的最安全和最有效的使用,以及需要制定实践指南以标准化儿科肥胖症患者的护理途径.