PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
UNASSIGNED: Despite significant advancements in closing the global gender gap, there is still much progress to be made, particularly in the field of science and scientific research. Numerous studies have addressed this issue and identified a variety of factors that contribute to gender asymmetries in research.
UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to identify the determinants of gender gaps in scientific research present in the most cited studies of the past ten years as a first step towards closing these differences. Through a systematic literature review that incorporated the Proknow-C Knowledge Development Process and Constructivism methodology.
UNASSIGNED: The results lead us to identify four dimensions to classify the determinants of the gaps in scientific research: academic supply, research policies, scientific production and researcher profile with their respective quantitative or qualitative indicators.
UNASSIGNED: As a potential basis for further modeling that offers greater analytical and correlational depth, as well as the identification of targeted strategies aimed at reducing gender gaps in research.
UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to identify the determinants of gender gaps in scientific research present in the most cited studies of the past ten years as a first step towards closing these differences. Through a systematic literature review that incorporated the Proknow-C Knowledge Development Process and Constructivism methodology.
UNASSIGNED: The results lead us to identify four dimensions to classify the determinants of the gaps in scientific research: academic supply, research policies, scientific production and researcher profile with their respective quantitative or qualitative indicators.
UNASSIGNED: As a potential basis for further modeling that offers greater analytical and correlational depth, as well as the identification of targeted strategies aimed at reducing gender gaps in research.
摘要：
■尽管在缩小全球性别差距方面取得了重大进展，还有很大的进展，特别是在科学和科学研究领域。许多研究已经解决了这个问题，并确定了导致研究中性别不对称的各种因素。
这项研究旨在确定过去十年中引用最多的科学研究中存在的性别差距的决定因素，作为消除这些差异的第一步。通过结合Proknow-C知识开发过程和建构主义方法论的系统文献综述。
■结果使我们确定了四个维度来分类科学研究差距的决定因素：学术供应，研究政策,科学生产和研究人员概况及其各自的定量或定性指标。
■作为进一步建模的潜在基础，提供更大的分析和关联深度，以及确定旨在减少研究中性别差距的有针对性的战略。
这项研究旨在确定过去十年中引用最多的科学研究中存在的性别差距的决定因素，作为消除这些差异的第一步。通过结合Proknow-C知识开发过程和建构主义方法论的系统文献综述。
■结果使我们确定了四个维度来分类科学研究差距的决定因素：学术供应，研究政策,科学生产和研究人员概况及其各自的定量或定性指标。
■作为进一步建模的潜在基础，提供更大的分析和关联深度，以及确定旨在减少研究中性别差距的有针对性的战略。
