Abstract：
Sexual orientation and gender identity/expression change efforts (SOGIECEs) are discredited practices that are associated with serious negative effects and incompatible with modern standards for clinical practice. Despite evidence linking SOGIECEs with serious iatrogenic effects, and despite support for LGBTQ+-affirmative care alternatives, SOGIECE practices persist. In the 1970s and 1980s, Behavior Therapy published articles testing and/or endorsing SOGIECEs, thereby contributing to their overall development, acceptance, and use. The Behavior Therapy Task Force on SOGIECEs was assembled to conduct a rigorous review of the SOGIECE articles published in Behavior Therapy and to decide whether, and what, formal action(s) should be taken on these articles. This report provides a detailed review of the historic SOGIECE literature published in Behavior Therapy and outlines the Task Force\'s deliberative and democratic processes resulting in actions to: (1) add prominent advisory information to k = 24 SOGIECE papers in the form of digital \"black box\" disclaimers that caution readers that the SOGIECE practices tested or described in these papers are inconsistent with modern standards, (2) offset organizational financial benefits from the publication of these papers, and (3) promote LGBTQ+-affirmative practices. SOGIECEs are not the only concerning practices across the field\'s history, and the pages of today\'s scientific journals include practices that will be at odds with tomorrow\'s moral standards and ethical guidelines. This report calls for precautionary measures and editorial safeguards to minimize the future likelihood and impact of problematic published scholarship, including the need to fully include those with relevant lived experiences in all aspects of clinical science and peer review.
摘要：
性取向和性别认同/表达改变努力（SOGIECE）是信誉不佳的做法，与严重的负面影响有关，与临床实践的现代标准不符。尽管有证据表明SOGIECEs与严重的医源性影响有关，尽管支持LGBTQ+肯定护理替代品，SOGIECE做法仍然存在。在1970年代和1980年代，行为疗法发表的文章测试和/或认可SOGIECE，从而促进他们的全面发展，接受,和使用。组织了行为疗法工作组，以对行为疗法上发表的SOGIECE文章进行严格的审查，并决定是否，什么，应该对这些条款采取正式行动。本报告对行为疗法上发表的SOGIECE历史文献进行了详细的回顾，并概述了工作队的审议和民主过程，从而采取了以下行动：（1）以数字形式向k=24篇SOGIECE论文添加突出的咨询信息“黑匣子”免责声明，警告读者这些论文中测试或描述的SOGIECE实践与现代标准不一致，(2)抵消这些论文发表的组织财务收益，(3)推广LGBTQ+肯定做法。SOGIECE并不是该领域历史上唯一涉及的实践，今天的科学期刊的页面包括与明天的道德标准和道德准则不一致的实践。本报告呼吁采取预防措施和编辑保障措施，以最大程度地减少存在问题的奖学金的未来可能性和影响。包括需要在临床科学和同行评审的各个方面充分包括具有相关生活经验的人。
