PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
This study aimed to systematically review current research on the application of existing social support scales in research with refugees in resettlement, assess their quality, and identify gaps in measurement to enhance research and practice. A scoping review was conducted on the extant literature published until March 2023. A team of researchers conducted search, sorting, and data extraction processes following best practices for scale development and validation. Of the 1185 studies collected from the search process, 41 articles were retained in the final analysis, from which 17 distinct social support instruments used in research with resettled refugees were identified. An assessment of all 17 instruments showed the presence of one or more limitations associated with construct, criterion, convergent, and/or discriminant validity. Test of reliability was assessed in all studies, with a range of 0.80 to 0.90. Our findings show that most of the research evaluating social support among resettled refugees is conducted without measurement instruments adequately validated in the resettlement context. This analysis highlights the need for rigorously developed social support scales that reflect the lived experiences, needs, and priorities of resettled refugees.
摘要：
本研究旨在系统回顾现有社会支持量表在难民安置研究中的应用现状。评估他们的质量，并找出测量方面的差距，以加强研究和实践。对2023年3月之前出版的现有文献进行了范围审查。一组研究人员进行了搜索，排序，和数据提取过程遵循规模开发和验证的最佳实践。在搜索过程中收集的1185项研究中，最终分析保留了41篇文章，从中确定了在重新安置的难民研究中使用的17种不同的社会支持工具。对所有17种仪器的评估显示存在与构建体相关的一个或多个限制，判据,convergent,和/或判别效度。在所有研究中都评估了可靠性测试，范围为0.80至0.90。我们的发现表明，评估重新安置的难民中社会支持的大多数研究都是在没有在重新安置背景下充分验证的测量工具的情况下进行的。这一分析强调了需要严格开发的社会支持量表，以反映生活经验，需要,以及重新安置难民的优先事项。
