PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
This systematic review investigated the practices that support and hinder the recovery and healing of communities and the environments within which they live, following climate-related environmental disasters. Although the literature focused on recovery is dominated by interventions aimed at the individual and their mental health, a thematic analysis of thirty-six studies established a range of practices that enhance collective recovery and healing. Four narratives were identified from the findings highlighting key practices: (1) collective and community-led recovery; (2) recognising the criticality of context, place, and identity; (3) adopting a holistic conception of well-being and Country-centred practices; and (4) decolonising and Indigenising the literature. This study details recommendations for research and practice. First Nations\' knowledges and healing practices need to be recognised and harnessed in climate-related environmental disaster recovery. Community-led interventions harness local knowledge, networks, and expertise, which improves the dissemination of resources and enables recovery efforts to be tailored to the specific needs of communities.
摘要：
这项系统审查调查了支持和阻碍社区及其生活环境恢复和康复的做法，在与气候相关的环境灾害之后。尽管关注康复的文献主要是针对个人及其心理健康的干预措施，对36项研究的主题分析建立了一系列可促进集体康复和康复的实践。从强调关键实践的调查结果中确定了四个叙述：（1）集体和社区主导的恢复；（2）认识到背景的重要性，地点,和身份；（3）采用整体的福祉概念和以国家为中心的做法；（4）对文献进行非殖民化和本土化。本研究详细介绍了研究和实践的建议。需要在与气候相关的环境灾难恢复中认识和利用原住民的知识和治疗方法。社区主导的干预措施利用当地知识，网络,和专业知识，这改善了资源的传播，并使恢复工作能够适应社区的具体需求。
