RESULTS: We analyzed 9424 gastric cancer patients who underwent either DG (n = 9183) or PPG (n = 241). PSW balanced variables such as age, sex, TNM stage, comorbidities, ASA score, and surgical approach. Before PSW, 87.8% of DG patients and 87.1% of PPG patients had no complications (p = 0.053). Severe complications (Clavien-Dindo IIIa or higher) were more frequent in PPG (6.6%) than in DG (3.8%) (p = 0.039). After PSW, overall complication rates (p = 0.960) and severe complication rates (p = 0.574) were similar between groups. Incidence rates of anastomotic stricture and leakage were higher in PPG (2.9% and 1.7%) compared to DG (0.6% and 0.5%) (p = 0.001 and 0.036) before PSW, but these differences were not significant after PSW (p = 0.999 and 0.123).
CONCLUSIONS: The PSW-adjusted analysis indicates no significant difference in overall and severe complication rates between PPG and DG in gastric cancer patients.
结果:我们分析了9424例接受DG(n=9183)或PPG(n=241)的胃癌患者。PSW平衡变量,如年龄,性别,TNM阶段,合并症,ASA得分,和手术方法。在PSW之前,87.8%的DG患者和87.1%的PPG患者没有并发症(p=0.053)。严重并发症(Clavien-DindoIIIa或更高)在PPG(6.6%)中的发生率高于DG(3.8%)(p=0.039)。PSW之后,两组间的总并发症发生率(p=0.960)和严重并发症发生率(p=0.574)相似.与PSW前的DG(0.6%和0.5%)相比,PPG的吻合口狭窄和渗漏的发生率更高(2.9%和1.7%)(p=0.001和0.036),但PSW后这些差异并不显著(p=0.999和0.123)。
结论:PSW校正分析表明,胃癌患者PPG和DG的总体和严重并发症发生率无显著差异。