METHODS: This comprehensive study aimed to assess the postoperative oral health status of patients receiving personalized 3D-printed implants and investigate the advantages and disadvantages between the 3D-printed implant and conventional protocol. Additionally, variance analysis was employed to delve into the correlation between periodontal status and overall oral health. Comparisons of continuous paired parameters were made by t-test.
RESULTS: The results of our study indicate a commendable one-year survival rate of over 94% for 3D-printed implants. This finding was corroborated by periodontal examinations and follow-up surveys using the Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14) questionnaire, revealing excellent postoperative oral health status among patients. Notably, OHIP-14 scores were significantly higher in patients with suboptimal periodontal health, suggesting a strong link between periodontal health and overall oral well-being. Moreover, we found that the operating time (14.41 ± 4.64 min) was less statistically significant than for the control group (31.76 ± 6.83 min).
CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, personalized 3D-printed implant surgery has emerged as a reliable clinical option, offering a viable alternative to traditional implant methods. However, it is imperative to gather further evidence-based medical support through extended follow-up studies to validate its long-term efficacy and safety.
方法:这项综合研究旨在评估接受个性化3D打印植入物的患者的术后口腔健康状况,并研究3D打印植入物与常规方案之间的优缺点。此外,方差分析用于研究牙周状况与整体口腔健康之间的相关性。连续配对参数的比较采用t检验。
结果:我们的研究结果表明,3D打印植入物的一年生存率超过94%。牙周检查和使用口腔健康影响概况14(OHIP-14)问卷进行的随访调查证实了这一发现,揭示患者术后良好的口腔健康状况。值得注意的是,牙周健康欠佳患者的OHIP-14评分明显较高,表明牙周健康和整体口腔健康之间有很强的联系。此外,我们发现,手术时间(14.41±4.64min)与对照组(31.76±6.83min)相比,差异无统计学意义.
结论:结论:个性化的3D打印植入手术已成为一种可靠的临床选择,提供了一个可行的替代传统的植入方法。然而,我们必须通过长期随访研究进一步收集循证医学支持,以验证其长期疗效和安全性.