METHODS: In a double-blind, split-face, randomized controlled trial involving 20 subjects, the effectiveness of 3% TA versus 4% HQ cream was evaluated over 8 weeks. The modified melasma area and severity index (mMASI), melanin index, erythema index, and side effects were assessed. Subjective improvement was measured using the patient global assessment (PtGA).
RESULTS: A significant decline in the mMASI score was observed at weeks 4 and 8 in both groups compared to baseline. There were no statistically significant differences in PtGA scores between the 3% TA group and the 4% HQ group.
CONCLUSIONS: Topical 3% TA is as effective and safe as 4% HQ for treating melasma in the Indonesian population, with potential advantages in terms of side-effect profiles.
方法:在双盲中,分割面,涉及20名受试者的随机对照试验,在8周内评估了3%TA与4%HQ乳膏的有效性。修改后的黄褐斑面积和严重程度指数(mMASI),黑色素指数,红斑指数,和副作用进行了评估。使用患者整体评估(PtGA)测量主观改善。
结果:与基线相比,两组在第4周和第8周观察到mMASI评分显着下降。3%TA组和4%HQ组的PtGA评分无统计学差别。
结论:外用3%TA与4%HQ一样有效且安全,可治疗印度尼西亚人群中的黄褐斑,在副作用方面具有潜在的优势。