PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
BACKGROUND: Socialism with Chinese characteristics has entered a new stage. The principal social contradiction is the uneven development of urban and rural areas. The rural revitalization strategy has emerged as time has required. The realization of rural revitalization not only requires development to lay the foundation of the countryside but also requires governance to lead the development of the countryside. Development and governance are two indispensable aspects of rural revitalization. However, China\'s rural areas have long been in a state of development without governance, and this situation must change. Therefore, systematically exploring the relationship between development and governance is the key to solving the current shortcomings in rural areas.
METHODS: Based on the data from the statistical yearbook, the study constructed a set of evaluation indicators for rural development governance and revitalization and verified the model\'s effectiveness.The entropy method and the assessment model were used to calculate the comprehensive score of rural development, governance, and revitalization. The relationship between rural development and governance was analyzed using a coupled coordination model. The regression analysis model was used to explore the relationship between the coupling results of rural development, governance, and rural revitalization.
RESULTS: From the comprehensive results, both development and governance show an upward trend, but the upward trend of development is better. From the analysis of coupling coordination between development and governance, the C value is in good condition, the T value fluctuates wildly, and the D fluctuates with the fluctuation of T. Judging from the comprehensive score of rural revitalization, it also shows an upward trend year by year. Judging from the regression analysis results of coupling coordination degree and rural revitalization comprehensive score, coupling coordination degree will significantly impact the rural revitalization evaluation value.
CONCLUSIONS: The study found that current rural development and governance present a spiral coupling coordination relationship, and the degree of coupling coordination significantly correlates with rural revitalization. Based on the research conclusions, the study further proposes three paths to promote the coupling and coordination of development and governance. The first is an organizational isomorphism, which builds a coupled coordination system for rural development and governance. The second is to tilt resources and improve the supply of connected and coordinated factors for rural development and governance. The third is the operating mechanism to optimize rural development and governance\'s coupling and coordination path.
METHODS: Based on the data from the statistical yearbook, the study constructed a set of evaluation indicators for rural development governance and revitalization and verified the model\'s effectiveness.The entropy method and the assessment model were used to calculate the comprehensive score of rural development, governance, and revitalization. The relationship between rural development and governance was analyzed using a coupled coordination model. The regression analysis model was used to explore the relationship between the coupling results of rural development, governance, and rural revitalization.
RESULTS: From the comprehensive results, both development and governance show an upward trend, but the upward trend of development is better. From the analysis of coupling coordination between development and governance, the C value is in good condition, the T value fluctuates wildly, and the D fluctuates with the fluctuation of T. Judging from the comprehensive score of rural revitalization, it also shows an upward trend year by year. Judging from the regression analysis results of coupling coordination degree and rural revitalization comprehensive score, coupling coordination degree will significantly impact the rural revitalization evaluation value.
CONCLUSIONS: The study found that current rural development and governance present a spiral coupling coordination relationship, and the degree of coupling coordination significantly correlates with rural revitalization. Based on the research conclusions, the study further proposes three paths to promote the coupling and coordination of development and governance. The first is an organizational isomorphism, which builds a coupled coordination system for rural development and governance. The second is to tilt resources and improve the supply of connected and coordinated factors for rural development and governance. The third is the operating mechanism to optimize rural development and governance\'s coupling and coordination path.
摘要：
背景：中国特色社会主义进入新阶段。社会主要矛盾是城乡发展不平衡。乡村振兴战略应运而生。乡村振兴的实现,不仅需要发展打基础,更需要治理引领农村发展。发展和治理是乡村振兴不可或缺的两个方面。然而,中国农村长期处于无治理的发展状态,这种情况必须改变。因此,系统探索发展与治理的关系是解决当前农村不足的关键。
方法：根据统计年鉴的数据，构建了一套乡村发展治理与振兴的评价指标,并验证了模型的有效性。采用熵值法和评价模型计算农村发展综合得分,治理，和振兴。使用耦合协调模型分析了农村发展与治理之间的关系。运用回归分析模型探讨了农村发展耦合结果与农村发展的关系,治理，和乡村振兴。
结果：从综合结果来看，发展和治理都呈上升趋势，但是向上的发展趋势更好。从发展与治理的耦合协调分析,C值处于良好状态，T值波动剧烈，D随着T的波动而波动，从乡村振兴的综合得分来看，它也显示出逐年上升的趋势。从耦合协调度与乡村振兴综合得分的回归分析结果来看,耦合协调度将显著影响乡村振兴评估值。
结论:研究发现,当前农村发展与治理呈现螺旋耦合协调关系,耦合协调度与乡村振兴显著相关。根据研究结论,研究进一步提出了促进发展与治理耦合协调的三条路径。第一个是组织同构，构建了农村发展与治理耦合协调体系。二是倾斜资源,提高农村发展治理的衔接要素供给。三是优化农村发展与治理耦合协调路径的运行机制。
方法：根据统计年鉴的数据，构建了一套乡村发展治理与振兴的评价指标,并验证了模型的有效性。采用熵值法和评价模型计算农村发展综合得分,治理，和振兴。使用耦合协调模型分析了农村发展与治理之间的关系。运用回归分析模型探讨了农村发展耦合结果与农村发展的关系,治理，和乡村振兴。
结果：从综合结果来看，发展和治理都呈上升趋势，但是向上的发展趋势更好。从发展与治理的耦合协调分析,C值处于良好状态，T值波动剧烈，D随着T的波动而波动，从乡村振兴的综合得分来看，它也显示出逐年上升的趋势。从耦合协调度与乡村振兴综合得分的回归分析结果来看,耦合协调度将显著影响乡村振兴评估值。
结论:研究发现,当前农村发展与治理呈现螺旋耦合协调关系,耦合协调度与乡村振兴显著相关。根据研究结论,研究进一步提出了促进发展与治理耦合协调的三条路径。第一个是组织同构，构建了农村发展与治理耦合协调体系。二是倾斜资源,提高农村发展治理的衔接要素供给。三是优化农村发展与治理耦合协调路径的运行机制。
