Abstract：
BACKGROUND: The evolving landscape of healthcare information dissemination has been dramatically influenced by the rise of artificial intelligence (AI) driven chatbots, providing patients with accessible and interactive platforms to obtain knowledge about medical procedures and conditions. Among the various surgical interventions in urology, inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) is a common treatment for men with erectile dysfunction. As patients increasingly seek comprehensive resources to understand what this procedure entails, AI-based chat technologies, such as ChatGPT, have become more prominent. This study aimed to assess the capacity of ChatGPT to provide accurate and easily understandable responses to common questions regarding the IPP procedure.
METHODS: Ten frequently asked questions (FAQ) about the IPP procedure were presented to the ChatGPT chatbot in separate conversational sessions without follow up questions or repetitions. An evidence-based approach was employed to assess the accuracy of the chatbot\'s responses. Responses were categorized as \"excellent response not requiring clarification,\" \"satisfactory requiring minimal clarification,\" \"satisfactory requiring moderate clarification,\" or \"unsatisfactory requiring substantial clarification.\"
RESULTS: Upon review, 70% of ChatGPT\'s answers to questions regarding the IPP procedure were rated as \"excellent,\" not necessitating further clarification. Twenty percent were considered \"satisfactory,\" requiring minimal clarification, notably on the omission of statistical data and the depth of discussion on certain topics. Ten percent of the responses were \"unsatisfactory,\" requiring substantial clarification, including a failure to provide a definitive answer when necessary.
CONCLUSIONS: This study reveals that ChatGPT has a substantial capability to produce evidence-based, understandable responses to a majority of common questions related to the IPP procedure. While there is room for improvement, ChatGPT can serve as an advantageous tool for patient education, enhancing preoperative understanding and contributing to informed decision-making during urological consultations for IPP.
METHODS: Ten frequently asked questions (FAQ) about the IPP procedure were presented to the ChatGPT chatbot in separate conversational sessions without follow up questions or repetitions. An evidence-based approach was employed to assess the accuracy of the chatbot\'s responses. Responses were categorized as \"excellent response not requiring clarification,\" \"satisfactory requiring minimal clarification,\" \"satisfactory requiring moderate clarification,\" or \"unsatisfactory requiring substantial clarification.\"
RESULTS: Upon review, 70% of ChatGPT\'s answers to questions regarding the IPP procedure were rated as \"excellent,\" not necessitating further clarification. Twenty percent were considered \"satisfactory,\" requiring minimal clarification, notably on the omission of statistical data and the depth of discussion on certain topics. Ten percent of the responses were \"unsatisfactory,\" requiring substantial clarification, including a failure to provide a definitive answer when necessary.
CONCLUSIONS: This study reveals that ChatGPT has a substantial capability to produce evidence-based, understandable responses to a majority of common questions related to the IPP procedure. While there is room for improvement, ChatGPT can serve as an advantageous tool for patient education, enhancing preoperative understanding and contributing to informed decision-making during urological consultations for IPP.
摘要：
背景：不断发展的医疗保健信息传播格局受到人工智能（AI）驱动的聊天机器人兴起的巨大影响，为患者提供可访问和互动的平台，以获得有关医疗程序和条件的知识。在泌尿外科的各种手术干预中，充气阴茎假体（IPP）是男性勃起功能障碍的常用治疗方法。随着患者越来越多地寻求全面的资源来了解这个程序需要什么，基于AI的聊天技术，比如ChatGPT,变得更加突出。这项研究旨在评估ChatGPT对有关IPP程序的常见问题提供准确且易于理解的响应的能力。
方法：关于IPP程序的十个常见问题（FAQ）在单独的会话中呈现给ChatGPT聊天机器人，没有后续问题或重复。采用基于证据的方法来评估聊天机器人响应的准确性。回应被归类为“优秀的回应，不需要澄清，“\”令人满意，需要最少的澄清，“\”令人满意，需要适度澄清，“或”不令人满意，需要大量澄清。\"
结果：经审核，ChatGPT对有关IPP程序的问题的回答中有70％被评为“优秀”，“不需要进一步澄清。20%的人认为“令人满意”，“需要最少的澄清，特别是对统计数据的遗漏和对某些主题的深入讨论。百分之十的回答是“不满意，“需要大量澄清，包括在必要时未能提供明确的答案。
结论：这项研究表明，ChatGPT具有足够的能力来产生基于证据的，对与IPP程序相关的大多数常见问题的可理解的回答。虽然还有改进的空间，ChatGPT可以作为患者教育的有利工具，加强术前理解，并有助于在IPP泌尿外科会诊期间做出知情决策。
方法：关于IPP程序的十个常见问题（FAQ）在单独的会话中呈现给ChatGPT聊天机器人，没有后续问题或重复。采用基于证据的方法来评估聊天机器人响应的准确性。回应被归类为“优秀的回应，不需要澄清，“\”令人满意，需要最少的澄清，“\”令人满意，需要适度澄清，“或”不令人满意，需要大量澄清。\"
结果：经审核，ChatGPT对有关IPP程序的问题的回答中有70％被评为“优秀”，“不需要进一步澄清。20%的人认为“令人满意”，“需要最少的澄清，特别是对统计数据的遗漏和对某些主题的深入讨论。百分之十的回答是“不满意，“需要大量澄清，包括在必要时未能提供明确的答案。
结论：这项研究表明，ChatGPT具有足够的能力来产生基于证据的，对与IPP程序相关的大多数常见问题的可理解的回答。虽然还有改进的空间，ChatGPT可以作为患者教育的有利工具，加强术前理解，并有助于在IPP泌尿外科会诊期间做出知情决策。
