PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
We present a test of the two most established reciprocity models, an intention factor model and a reference value model. We test characteristic elements of each model in a series of twelve mini-ultimatum games. Results from online experiments show major differences between actual behavior and predictions of both models: the distance of actual offers to the proposed reference value provides a poor measure for the kindness of offers, while a comparison of offers with extreme offers as suggested by the intention factor model makes offers indiscriminable in richer settings. We discuss possible combinations of both models better describing our observations.
摘要：
我们对两个最成熟的互惠模型进行了测试，意向因素模型和参考值模型。我们在一系列十二个迷你最后通牒游戏中测试每个模型的特征元素。在线实验结果表明，两种模型的实际行为和预测之间存在重大差异：实际报价与建议的参考值之间的距离对报价的善意提供了较差的度量，而意图因素模型所建议的报价与极端报价的比较使报价在更丰富的环境中无法区分。我们讨论了两种模型的可能组合，更好地描述了我们的观察结果。
