UNASSIGNED: The study included 48 patients aged 18-60 years with normal airways and 12 experienced anaesthesiologists. Patients were randomised into two groups using permuted block randomisation. Anaesthesiologists performed laryngoscopy and intubation in supine HELP and 25° backup HELP positions. Anaesthesiologist\'s posture was determined by measuring the angles of neck, wrist, elbow, back and knee joints, which were compared using Student\'s t-test, and subjective comfort assessed on a Likert scale was compared using the Chi-square test. As mentioned by the anaesthesiologist, Cormack- Lehane grading was also noted and compared using a Chi-square test between groups, taking a P value <0.05 as significant.
UNASSIGNED: Both positions demonstrated comparable anaesthesiologist posture (P = 0.919) and comfort (P = 0.644). However, the 25° backup HELP positions significantly improved Cormack-Lehane grades, with 68% achieving grade 1 compared to 31% in the supine HELP group (P = 0.012). Haemodynamic stability and tracheal intubation time showed no significant differences between the groups (P = 0.475 and 0.117, respectively), and no complications were reported in either group.
UNASSIGNED: Anaesthesiologists\' posture and comfort during laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation are similar between supine and 25° backup in patients with easy airways.
■该研究包括48名年龄在18-60岁之间、气道正常的患者和12名经验丰富的麻醉师。使用置换区组随机化将患者随机分为两组。麻醉医师在仰卧HELP和25°备用HELP位置进行了喉镜检查和插管。麻醉师的姿势是通过测量颈部的角度来确定的,手腕,弯头,背部和膝关节,使用学生t检验进行比较,使用卡方检验比较了在李克特量表上评估的主观舒适度。正如麻醉师提到的,Cormack-Lehane分级也被注意到,并在组间使用卡方检验进行比较。以P值<0.05为显著。
■两种姿势均显示出相当的麻醉师姿势(P=0.919)和舒适度(P=0.644)。然而,25°备用帮助位置显着提高了Cormack-Lehane成绩,其中68%达到1级,而仰卧HELP组为31%(P=0.012)。两组间血流动力学稳定性和气管插管时间差异无统计学意义(P=0.475和0.117)。两组均未出现并发症.
■麻醉医师\'在喉镜检查和气管插管期间的姿势和舒适度在仰卧和25°备份之间相似。