PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated technological changes in veterinary education, particularly in clinical pathology and anatomic pathology courses transitioning from traditional methods to digital pathology (DP). This study evaluates the personal effectiveness and satisfaction, as well as the advantages and disadvantages, of DP, in particular digital cytology (DC), as a teaching method among European veterinary students, both at the undergraduate and postgraduate level, who attended digital pathology courses during and before the pandemic. A further aim is to discuss the differences between the two student groups. A Google Form survey consisting of 11 multiple-choice questions was emailed to pathology teachers and distributed to their students. Results indicated that undergraduate students showed greater digital pathology training, favouring DC as the most effective learning modality. In contrast, postgraduate students reported less digital slide training, and their preference for learning cytology was split between DC alone and DC integrated with traditional microscopy. All students experienced whole slide imaging for learning cytology slides prevalently, and they stated that DC enhanced their learning experience. While DC demonstrates personal effectiveness and satisfaction as a teaching method, it is important to not replace pathology training with light microscopy completely, as almost a third of the students indicated.
摘要：
COVID-19大流行加速了兽医教育的技术变革，特别是在从传统方法过渡到数字病理学（DP）的临床病理学和解剖病理学课程中。这项研究评估了个人的效能和满意度，以及优点和缺点，DP,特别是数字细胞学（DC），作为欧洲兽医学生的教学方法，在本科和研究生阶段，在大流行期间和之前参加了数字病理学课程。另一个目的是讨论两个学生群体之间的差异。由11个多项选择题组成的GoogleForm调查已通过电子邮件发送给病理老师并分发给他们的学生。结果表明，本科生展示了更多的数字病理学培训，偏爱DC作为最有效的学习方式。相比之下,研究生报告数字幻灯片培训较少，他们对学习细胞学的偏好分为单独的DC和与传统显微镜结合的DC。所有学生都经历了整个幻灯片成像学习细胞学幻灯片普遍，他们表示DC增强了他们的学习经验。虽然DC展示了个人有效性和满意度作为一种教学方法，重要的是不要用光学显微镜完全取代病理训练，几乎三分之一的学生表示。
