Abstract：
In this contribution, we discuss criteria for the quality of qualitative research. We consider reliability and validity as specifications of the comprehensive requirement for \'intersubjective replicability\', with which qualitative research should comply. In the data collection phase, \'argumentative\' reliability generally must suffice; in the data analysis phase, attention must also be given to \'technical\' reliability. Validation of qualitative research has to take place via three approaches: \'communicative\', \'critical\' or \'empirical\' validation. This clarifies the relative validity or \'authenticity\' of qualitative research.
摘要：
在这一贡献中,我们讨论了定性研究质量的标准。我们将信度和效度视为“主体间可复制性”综合要求的规范，定性研究应该遵守的。在数据收集阶段，“论证性”可靠性通常必须足够；在数据分析阶段，还必须注意“技术”可靠性。定性研究的验证必须通过三种方法进行：“交流”，\'关键\'或\'经验\'验证。这澄清了定性研究的相对有效性或“真实性”。
