关键词: antiseizure medications atrial fibrillation epilepsy non‐vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants

来  源:   DOI:10.1111/epi.18039

Abstract:
Research on cerebrovascular events in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients taking non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) with antiseizure medications (ASMs) is limited, highlighting a significant gap in literature. We assessed thrombotic and hemorrhagic risks in patients on NOACs and ASMs versus those on NOACs or ASMs alone. We analyzed a retrospective cohort from five centers, including AF and epilepsy patients on both medications (n = 188), AF patients on NOACs (n = 298), and epilepsy patients on ASMs (n = 50), with a 3-year follow-up. Propensity score matching adjusted for cardiovascular risk differences. The primary outcomes were ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, and major bleeding. Results showed the ASM+NOAC group had a higher risk of primary outcomes compared to the NOAC-only group (5.68% vs. 1.18%, hazard ratio = 5.72, 95% confidence interval = 2.22-14.73), with no events in the ASM-only group. This suggests an increased risk for patients on combined NOAC and ASM therapy, underlining the need for careful drug interaction consideration.
摘要:
房颤(AF)患者服用非维生素K拮抗剂口服抗凝剂(NOACs)与抗癫痫药物(ASM)的脑血管事件研究有限,突出了文学上的巨大差距。我们评估了使用NOAC和ASM的患者与仅使用NOAC或ASM的患者的血栓形成和出血风险。我们分析了来自五个中心的回顾性队列,包括两种药物的房颤和癫痫患者(n=188),接受NOAC治疗的AF患者(n=298),和ASM上的癫痫患者(n=50),3年随访。倾向评分匹配调整了心血管风险差异。主要结果是缺血性卒中,短暂性脑缺血发作,大出血.结果显示,与仅NOAC组相比,ASM+NOAC组有更高的主要结局风险(5.68%vs.1.18%,危险比=5.72,95%置信区间=2.22-14.73),仅ASM组中没有事件。这表明接受NOAC和ASM联合治疗的患者的风险增加,强调需要仔细考虑药物相互作用。
公众号