关键词: guidelines risk score venous thromboembolism

Mesh : Humans Venous Thromboembolism Practice Guidelines as Topic Risk Factors Societies, Medical Risk Assessment / methods Female

来  源:   DOI:10.1177/10760296241263856   PDF(Pubmed)

Abstract:
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Risk scores associated with VTE have been widely used in clinical practice. Among numerous scores published, those included in guidelines are usually typical risk scores which have been extensively validated and globally recognized. This review provides an updated overview of the risk scores associated with VTE endorsed by 3 guidelines which are highly recognized in the field of VTE including the European Society of Cardiology, American College of Chest Physicians, and American Society of Hematology, focusing on the development, modification, validation, and comparison of these scores, to provide a comprehensive and updated understanding of all the classic risk scores associated with VTE to medical readers including but not limited to cardiologists, pulmonologists, hematologists, intensivists, physicians, surgeons, and researchers. Although each score recommended by these guidelines was more or less validated, there may still be room for further improvement. It may still be necessary to seek simpler, more practical, and more universally applicable VTE-related risk scores in the future.
摘要:
静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)与高发病率和高死亡率相关。与VTE相关的风险评分已广泛用于临床实践。在发表的众多分数中,指南中包含的通常是典型的风险评分,这些评分已得到广泛验证和全球认可.这篇综述提供了与VTE相关的风险评分的最新概述,该评分由3个指南认可,这些指南在VTE领域得到了高度认可,包括欧洲心脏病学会。美国胸科医师学会,和美国血液学会,着眼于发展,修改,验证,以及这些分数的比较,为包括但不限于心脏病专家在内的医学读者提供与VTE相关的所有经典风险评分的全面和最新的理解,肺病学家,血液学家,密集主义者,医师,外科医生,和研究人员。尽管这些指南推荐的每个分数或多或少都得到了验证,仍有进一步改进的空间。可能仍然有必要寻求更简单的方法,更实用,以及未来更普遍适用的VTE相关风险评分。
公众号