PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
UNASSIGNED: The research carried out is a large research project that examined two different massage methods on many variables so that they can determine their effect on variables on a wider scale, namely pain, range of movement (ROM), and low back function. Pain and ROM variables have been published in different journals, and their acute effects are only known after treatment and the results are effective. This study examined the low back function variable 24, 48, and 72 hours after treatment.
UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of Tepurak and deep tissue massaging with stretching (DTMS) on low back function in nonspecific low back pain (NSLBP) and conduct a comparison of the effectiveness of Tepurak versus DTMS for low back function in NSLBP.
UNASSIGNED: This research is a quasi-experiment using a pre-test/post-test design to determine the difference in scores before and after treatment. The variable measured involved the low back function using the Oswestry Disability Index. Measurements were carried out four times at pre-test, 24, 48, and 72 hours after the treatments. This study used two different sample groups. The research sample consisted of 42 NSLBP sufferers who were randomly divided into two groups, A and B. Group A received Tepurak treatment, while Group B received DTMS treatment. These treatments were carried out in one treatment session.
UNASSIGNED: The results of the different treatments for the low back function variables in the Tepurak treatment have a p-value of 0.000. The results of the low back function variables in the DTMS treatment have a p-value of 0.000. The results of the comparison test of Tepurak versus DTMS therapy for the low back function variable had a p-value of 0.771.
UNASSIGNED: Both Tepurak and DTMS are effective in improving low back function in NSLBP cases. In comparison between Tepurak and DTMS, there was no significant difference in the effectiveness in improving low back function in NSLBP cases.
UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of Tepurak and deep tissue massaging with stretching (DTMS) on low back function in nonspecific low back pain (NSLBP) and conduct a comparison of the effectiveness of Tepurak versus DTMS for low back function in NSLBP.
UNASSIGNED: This research is a quasi-experiment using a pre-test/post-test design to determine the difference in scores before and after treatment. The variable measured involved the low back function using the Oswestry Disability Index. Measurements were carried out four times at pre-test, 24, 48, and 72 hours after the treatments. This study used two different sample groups. The research sample consisted of 42 NSLBP sufferers who were randomly divided into two groups, A and B. Group A received Tepurak treatment, while Group B received DTMS treatment. These treatments were carried out in one treatment session.
UNASSIGNED: The results of the different treatments for the low back function variables in the Tepurak treatment have a p-value of 0.000. The results of the low back function variables in the DTMS treatment have a p-value of 0.000. The results of the comparison test of Tepurak versus DTMS therapy for the low back function variable had a p-value of 0.771.
UNASSIGNED: Both Tepurak and DTMS are effective in improving low back function in NSLBP cases. In comparison between Tepurak and DTMS, there was no significant difference in the effectiveness in improving low back function in NSLBP cases.
摘要：
■进行的研究是一个大型研究项目，该项目对许多变量上的两种不同的按摩方法进行了检查，以便它们可以在更广泛的范围内确定它们对变量的影响，即疼痛，运动范围（ROM），和低背功能。疼痛和ROM变量已经发表在不同的期刊上，只有在治疗后才知道它们的急性作用，结果是有效的。这项研究检查了治疗后24、48和72小时的低背功能变量。
■本研究旨在确定Tepurak和深层组织拉伸按摩（DTMS）对非特异性下腰痛（NSLBP）的下背部功能的有效性，并比较Tepurak和DTMS对NSLBP的下背部功能的有效性。
■这项研究是一项准实验，使用前测/后测设计来确定治疗前后得分的差异。测量的变量涉及使用Oswestry残疾指数的低背函数。测试前进行了四次测量,在处理后24、48和72小时。本研究使用了两个不同的样本组。研究样本由42名NSLBP患者组成，随机分为两组，A组和B组接受Tepurak治疗，B组接受DTMS治疗。这些处理在一个疗程中进行。
■Tepurak处理中低反函数变量的不同处理结果的p值为0.000。DTMS处理中的低反函数变量的结果具有0.000的p值。Tepurak与DTMS疗法对低背功能变量的比较测试结果的p值为0.771。
■Tepurak和DTMS均可有效改善NSLBP病例的低背功能。在Tepurak和DTMS之间的比较，在NSLBP病例中,改善腰背功能的效果无显著差异.
■本研究旨在确定Tepurak和深层组织拉伸按摩（DTMS）对非特异性下腰痛（NSLBP）的下背部功能的有效性，并比较Tepurak和DTMS对NSLBP的下背部功能的有效性。
■这项研究是一项准实验，使用前测/后测设计来确定治疗前后得分的差异。测量的变量涉及使用Oswestry残疾指数的低背函数。测试前进行了四次测量,在处理后24、48和72小时。本研究使用了两个不同的样本组。研究样本由42名NSLBP患者组成，随机分为两组，A组和B组接受Tepurak治疗，B组接受DTMS治疗。这些处理在一个疗程中进行。
■Tepurak处理中低反函数变量的不同处理结果的p值为0.000。DTMS处理中的低反函数变量的结果具有0.000的p值。Tepurak与DTMS疗法对低背功能变量的比较测试结果的p值为0.771。
■Tepurak和DTMS均可有效改善NSLBP病例的低背功能。在Tepurak和DTMS之间的比较，在NSLBP病例中,改善腰背功能的效果无显著差异.
