Abstract：
There is increasing effort in science to support disaster risk management (DRM) and climate change adaptation in urban environments. It is now common for research calls and projects to reference coproduction methods and science uptake goals. This paper identifies lessons for researchers, research funders, and research users wishing to enable useful, useable, and used science based on the perspectives of research users in urban planning from low- and middle-income countries. DRM-supporting science is viewed by policy actors as: complicated and poorly communicated; presenting inadequate, partial, and outdated information; misaligned with policy cycles; and costly to access and inadequately positioned to overcome the policy barriers that hinder integration of DRM into urban planning. Addressing these specific concerns points to more systematic collection and organisation of data and enhancement of supporting administrative structures to facilitate better sight of human vulnerability and its link to development decision-making and wider processes of urban risk creation.
摘要：
科学越来越努力支持城市环境中的灾害风险管理（DRM）和气候变化适应。现在，研究呼吁和项目通常参考共同生产方法和科学吸收目标。这篇论文为研究人员确定了教训，研究资助者，和研究用户希望启用有用的，可用,并根据低收入和中等收入国家城市规划研究用户的观点使用科学。政策参与者将支持DRM的科学视为：复杂且沟通不良；呈现不足，局部,和过时的信息；与政策周期不一致；访问成本高昂，克服阻碍将DRM纳入城市规划的政策障碍的位置不足。解决这些具体问题需要更系统地收集和组织数据，并加强辅助行政结构，以更好地了解人类的脆弱性及其与发展决策和更广泛的城市风险创造过程的联系。
