Abstract：
UNASSIGNED: Rapid intervention development, implementation, and evaluation are required for emergency public health contexts, such as the recent COVID-19 pandemic. A novel Agile Co-production and Evaluation (ACE) framework has been developed to assist this endeavour in future public health emergencies. This scoping review aimed to map available behavioural science resources that can be used to develop and evaluate public health guidance, messaging, and interventions in emergency contexts onto components of ACE: rapid development and implementation, co-production with patients or the public including seldom heard voices from diverse communities, and inclusion of evaluation.
UNASSIGNED: A scoping review methodology was used. Searches were run on MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and Google, with search terms covering emergency response and behavioural science. Articles published since 2014 and which discussed a framework or guidance for using behavioural science in response to a public health emergency were included. A narrative synthesis was conducted.
UNASSIGNED: Seventeen records were included in the synthesis. The records covered a range of emergency contexts, the most frequent of which were COVID-19 (n = 7) and non-specific emergencies (n = 4). One record evaluated existing approaches, 6 proposed new approaches, and 10 described existing approaches. Commonly used approaches included the Behavioural Change Wheel; Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation Behaviour model; and social identity theory. Three records discuss co-production with the target audience and consideration of diverse populations. Four records incorporate rapid testing, evaluation, or validation methods. Six records state that their approaches are designed to be implemented rapidly. No records cover all components of ACE.
UNASSIGNED: We recommend that future research explores how to create guidance involving rapid implementation, co-production with patients or the public including seldom heard voices from diverse communities, and evaluation.
UNASSIGNED: A scoping review methodology was used. Searches were run on MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and Google, with search terms covering emergency response and behavioural science. Articles published since 2014 and which discussed a framework or guidance for using behavioural science in response to a public health emergency were included. A narrative synthesis was conducted.
UNASSIGNED: Seventeen records were included in the synthesis. The records covered a range of emergency contexts, the most frequent of which were COVID-19 (n = 7) and non-specific emergencies (n = 4). One record evaluated existing approaches, 6 proposed new approaches, and 10 described existing approaches. Commonly used approaches included the Behavioural Change Wheel; Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation Behaviour model; and social identity theory. Three records discuss co-production with the target audience and consideration of diverse populations. Four records incorporate rapid testing, evaluation, or validation methods. Six records state that their approaches are designed to be implemented rapidly. No records cover all components of ACE.
UNASSIGNED: We recommend that future research explores how to create guidance involving rapid implementation, co-production with patients or the public including seldom heard voices from diverse communities, and evaluation.
摘要：
■快速干预发展，实施，紧急公共卫生环境需要评估，例如最近的COVID-19大流行。已经开发了一种新的敏捷联合生产和评估（ACE）框架，以在未来的公共卫生紧急情况中协助这项工作。此范围审查旨在绘制可用的行为科学资源，可用于开发和评估公共卫生指南，消息传递，以及在紧急情况下对ACE组成部分的干预：快速开发和实施，与患者或公众共同制作，包括很少听到来自不同社区的声音，并纳入评估。
■使用了范围审查方法。搜索是在MEDLINE上运行的，EMBASE,PsycINFO,和谷歌,搜索词涵盖应急响应和行为科学。包括自2014年以来发表的文章，讨论了使用行为科学应对公共卫生紧急情况的框架或指南。进行了叙事综合。
■合成中包含了17条记录。记录涵盖了一系列紧急情况，其中最常见的是COVID-19(n=7)和非特异性紧急情况(n=4)。一份记录评估了现有的方法，6个提议的新方法，和10描述了现有的方法。常用的方法包括行为变化轮；能力，机会,和动机行为模型；和社会认同理论。三张唱片讨论了与目标受众的联合制作以及对不同人群的考虑。四个记录包含快速测试，评估，或验证方法。六项记录指出，他们的方法旨在迅速实施。没有记录涵盖ACE的所有组件。
■我们建议未来的研究探索如何创建涉及快速实施的指南，与患者或公众共同制作，包括很少听到来自不同社区的声音，和评价。
■使用了范围审查方法。搜索是在MEDLINE上运行的，EMBASE,PsycINFO,和谷歌,搜索词涵盖应急响应和行为科学。包括自2014年以来发表的文章，讨论了使用行为科学应对公共卫生紧急情况的框架或指南。进行了叙事综合。
■合成中包含了17条记录。记录涵盖了一系列紧急情况，其中最常见的是COVID-19(n=7)和非特异性紧急情况(n=4)。一份记录评估了现有的方法，6个提议的新方法，和10描述了现有的方法。常用的方法包括行为变化轮；能力，机会,和动机行为模型；和社会认同理论。三张唱片讨论了与目标受众的联合制作以及对不同人群的考虑。四个记录包含快速测试，评估，或验证方法。六项记录指出，他们的方法旨在迅速实施。没有记录涵盖ACE的所有组件。
■我们建议未来的研究探索如何创建涉及快速实施的指南，与患者或公众共同制作，包括很少听到来自不同社区的声音，和评价。
