PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
BACKGROUND: Sport-related injuries and illnesses can negatively impact athlete welfare at all standards of participation in team sports. Injury and illness surveillance (IIS), and the development of monitoring systems, initiates the sequence of injury and illness prevention. Operational IIS monitoring systems help to appraise epidemiological estimates of injury and illness incidence and burden in various athlete populations. However, the methodological underpinnings of various monitoring systems are not harmonized or widely documented, with the presence of efficient and successful programmes rarely showcased at non-elite levels. The aim is to provide a framework that guides the development of IIS, which will enhance overall surveillance, to indirectly inform injury prevention strategies.
METHODS: The process involved all members of the research group initially discussing the research gaps, scope of the project, and the aims of the article. Unique experiences were shared, and specific and global challenges and barriers to IIS at all standards of team sport participation were identified. A tiered system of data collection with corresponding content were produced, with experiences and guidance provided throughout the article.
RESULTS: The literature has been reviewed and using first-hand experience in conducting IIS programmes in complex and diverse sport settings, the authors have identified key enablers and barriers for best practise as time, technological and human resources, reporter/practitioner training, and medical expertise. Areas of greatest importance regarding the conducting of IIS have been outlined, providing guidance and recommendations across all levels of team sport participation. These areas include definitions, data context, collection procedures, handling, security, ethics, storage, dissemination, quality, compliance, and analysis. Given the barriers to IIS, 3-tiered levels of data collection and content have been proposed. The levels indicate data collection variables, with a focus on sufficiency and achievability, aiming to support the successful conducting of IIS in team sports across all standards of participation. Future opportunities in IIS have been discussed, with several predictive measures and analytical techniques expanded upon.
CONCLUSIONS: The framework provides universal guidance for implementing IIS monitoring systems, facilitating athletes, coaches, parents/guardians, governing bodies and practitioners to implement IIS processes, identify challenges, complete analysis, and interpret outcomes at all standards of participation.
METHODS: The process involved all members of the research group initially discussing the research gaps, scope of the project, and the aims of the article. Unique experiences were shared, and specific and global challenges and barriers to IIS at all standards of team sport participation were identified. A tiered system of data collection with corresponding content were produced, with experiences and guidance provided throughout the article.
RESULTS: The literature has been reviewed and using first-hand experience in conducting IIS programmes in complex and diverse sport settings, the authors have identified key enablers and barriers for best practise as time, technological and human resources, reporter/practitioner training, and medical expertise. Areas of greatest importance regarding the conducting of IIS have been outlined, providing guidance and recommendations across all levels of team sport participation. These areas include definitions, data context, collection procedures, handling, security, ethics, storage, dissemination, quality, compliance, and analysis. Given the barriers to IIS, 3-tiered levels of data collection and content have been proposed. The levels indicate data collection variables, with a focus on sufficiency and achievability, aiming to support the successful conducting of IIS in team sports across all standards of participation. Future opportunities in IIS have been discussed, with several predictive measures and analytical techniques expanded upon.
CONCLUSIONS: The framework provides universal guidance for implementing IIS monitoring systems, facilitating athletes, coaches, parents/guardians, governing bodies and practitioners to implement IIS processes, identify challenges, complete analysis, and interpret outcomes at all standards of participation.
摘要：
背景：与运动有关的伤害和疾病会对参加团队运动的所有标准的运动员福利产生负面影响。伤害和疾病监测（IIS），以及监控系统的发展，启动伤害和疾病预防的顺序。可操作的IIS监测系统有助于评估各种运动员人群中受伤和疾病发生率和负担的流行病学估计。然而,各种监测系统的方法基础没有统一或广泛记录，高效和成功的项目很少在非精英层面展示。目的是提供一个指导IIS开发的框架，这将加强整体监测，间接告知伤害预防策略。
方法：该过程涉及研究小组的所有成员最初讨论研究差距，项目范围,以及文章的目的。独特的经验被分享，并确定了所有团队运动参与标准中IIS的具体和全球性挑战和障碍。制作了具有相应内容的分层数据收集系统，在整篇文章中提供了经验和指导。
结果：对文献进行了回顾，并利用在复杂多样的运动环境中开展IIS项目的第一手经验，作者已经确定了最佳实践的关键促成因素和障碍，技术和人力资源，记者/从业人员培训，和医疗专业知识。概述了关于开展IIS的最重要领域，为团队运动参与的所有级别提供指导和建议。这些领域包括定义，数据上下文，收集程序，处理,安全,伦理,storage,传播,质量,合规,和分析。鉴于IIS的障碍，已经提出了3层级别的数据收集和内容。这些级别指示数据收集变量，注重充分性和可实现性，旨在支持IIS在所有参与标准中的团队运动中的成功进行。已经讨论了IIS中的未来机会，扩展了几种预测措施和分析技术。
结论：该框架为实现IIS监控系统提供了通用指导，促进运动员，教练，父母/监护人,实施IIS流程的管理机构和从业人员，识别挑战，完整的分析，并在所有参与标准下解释结果。
方法：该过程涉及研究小组的所有成员最初讨论研究差距，项目范围,以及文章的目的。独特的经验被分享，并确定了所有团队运动参与标准中IIS的具体和全球性挑战和障碍。制作了具有相应内容的分层数据收集系统，在整篇文章中提供了经验和指导。
结果：对文献进行了回顾，并利用在复杂多样的运动环境中开展IIS项目的第一手经验，作者已经确定了最佳实践的关键促成因素和障碍，技术和人力资源，记者/从业人员培训，和医疗专业知识。概述了关于开展IIS的最重要领域，为团队运动参与的所有级别提供指导和建议。这些领域包括定义，数据上下文，收集程序，处理,安全,伦理,storage,传播,质量,合规,和分析。鉴于IIS的障碍，已经提出了3层级别的数据收集和内容。这些级别指示数据收集变量，注重充分性和可实现性，旨在支持IIS在所有参与标准中的团队运动中的成功进行。已经讨论了IIS中的未来机会，扩展了几种预测措施和分析技术。
结论：该框架为实现IIS监控系统提供了通用指导，促进运动员，教练，父母/监护人,实施IIS流程的管理机构和从业人员，识别挑战，完整的分析，并在所有参与标准下解释结果。
