Abstract：
OBJECTIVE: Large numbers of people are subject to alterations and pathologies in the foot. To quantify how these problems of foot function affect the quality of life, clinicians and researchers have developed measures such as the Foot Function Index (FFI). Our aim is to determine the methodological quality of the FFI including adaptations to other languages.
METHODS: The studies considered in this review were extracted from the PubMed, Embase and CINAHL databases. The inclusion criteria were followed: (1) studies of patients with no previous foot or ankle pathology and aged over 18 years; (2) based on English-language patient-reported outcome measures that assess foot function; (3) the patient-reported outcome measures should present measurement properties based on COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) criteria.
METHODS: The systematic review was conducted following the COSMIN criteria to establish the methodological quality of the original FFI, together with its variants and adaptations. The last search was carried out in May 2024.
RESULTS: Of the 1994 studies obtained in the preliminary search, 20 were eligible for inclusion in the final analysis. These results are the validations and cross-cultural adaptations to the following languages: the original FFI has cross-cultural adaptation in 13 languages and the FFI-Revised Short Form has been adapted and validated for use in 2 languages.
CONCLUSIONS: In terms of methodological quality, the FFI-Revised Short Form questionnaire is a valuable instrument for evaluating ankle and foot function and could usefully be expanded to be available in more languages.
METHODS: The studies considered in this review were extracted from the PubMed, Embase and CINAHL databases. The inclusion criteria were followed: (1) studies of patients with no previous foot or ankle pathology and aged over 18 years; (2) based on English-language patient-reported outcome measures that assess foot function; (3) the patient-reported outcome measures should present measurement properties based on COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) criteria.
METHODS: The systematic review was conducted following the COSMIN criteria to establish the methodological quality of the original FFI, together with its variants and adaptations. The last search was carried out in May 2024.
RESULTS: Of the 1994 studies obtained in the preliminary search, 20 were eligible for inclusion in the final analysis. These results are the validations and cross-cultural adaptations to the following languages: the original FFI has cross-cultural adaptation in 13 languages and the FFI-Revised Short Form has been adapted and validated for use in 2 languages.
CONCLUSIONS: In terms of methodological quality, the FFI-Revised Short Form questionnaire is a valuable instrument for evaluating ankle and foot function and could usefully be expanded to be available in more languages.
摘要：
目的：大量的人在足部有改变和病变。为了量化这些足部功能问题如何影响生活质量，临床医生和研究人员已经开发了诸如足部功能指数（FFI）之类的措施。我们的目标是确定FFI的方法质量，包括对其他语言的适应。
方法：本综述中考虑的研究摘自PubMed，Embase和CINAHL数据库。纳入标准如下：（1）对先前没有足部或踝关节病理学且年龄超过18岁的患者的研究；（2）基于评估足部功能的英语患者报告的结果指标；（3）患者报告的结果指标应根据基于社区的健康测量工具（COSMIN）标准选择标准提出测量特性。
方法：根据COSMIN标准进行系统评价，以建立原始FFI的方法学质量，以及它的变体和改编。最后一次搜索是在2024年5月进行的。
结果：在初步搜索中获得的1994年研究中，20人符合纳入最终分析的条件。这些结果是对以下语言的验证和跨文化适应：原始FFI具有13种语言的跨文化适应，而FFI修订的简短形式已被改编并验证为2种语言。
结论：在方法学质量方面，FFI修订后的简短形式问卷是评估脚踝和足部功能的有价值的工具，可以有用地扩展到更多的语言版本。
方法：本综述中考虑的研究摘自PubMed，Embase和CINAHL数据库。纳入标准如下：（1）对先前没有足部或踝关节病理学且年龄超过18岁的患者的研究；（2）基于评估足部功能的英语患者报告的结果指标；（3）患者报告的结果指标应根据基于社区的健康测量工具（COSMIN）标准选择标准提出测量特性。
方法：根据COSMIN标准进行系统评价，以建立原始FFI的方法学质量，以及它的变体和改编。最后一次搜索是在2024年5月进行的。
结果：在初步搜索中获得的1994年研究中，20人符合纳入最终分析的条件。这些结果是对以下语言的验证和跨文化适应：原始FFI具有13种语言的跨文化适应，而FFI修订的简短形式已被改编并验证为2种语言。
结论：在方法学质量方面，FFI修订后的简短形式问卷是评估脚踝和足部功能的有价值的工具，可以有用地扩展到更多的语言版本。
