UNASSIGNED: We searched five major electronic databases: PubMed, PsycINFO, Scopus, CINAHL, and Web of Science for original publications on TMH E&T from January 2013 to May 2023. We extracted information from each publication and summarized key features of training programs including setting, target group, study aims, training modality, methods of assessing quality, and outcomes.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 20 articles were selected for the final review. Articles meeting inclusionary criteria were predominantly comprised of case studies and commentaries, focused on a TMH service/practice for a specific region/population, and were performed after 2020. All of the selected studies demonstrated a significant increase in the measured knowledge, skills, and abilities of the participants after TMH training. Nevertheless, there remains a lack of standardization of training methodologies, limited sample sizes and demographics, variability in study methodologies, and inconsistency of competency targets across studies.
UNASSIGNED: This systematic review highlighted the diversity of methods for TMH E&T. Future research on this topic could include more varied and larger-scale studies to further validate and extend current findings, as well as explore potential long-term effects of TMH training programs on both provider attitudes and patient outcomes.
■我们搜索了五个主要的电子数据库:PubMed、PsycINFO,Scopus,CINAHL,和WebofScience于2013年1月至2023年5月在TMHE&T上的原始出版物。我们从每个出版物中提取信息,并总结培训计划的关键特征,包括设置,目标群体,研究目的,训练方式,质量评估方法,和结果。
■总共选择了20篇文章进行最终审查。符合包容性标准的文章主要包括案例研究和评论,专注于针对特定地区/人口的TMH服务/实践,并在2020年之后执行。所有选定的研究表明,测量的知识显着增加,技能,和TMH训练后参与者的能力。然而,培训方法仍然缺乏标准化,有限的样本量和人口统计,研究方法的可变性,和不同研究的能力目标不一致。
■本系统综述强调了TMHE&T方法的多样性。关于这一主题的未来研究可能包括更多样化和更大规模的研究,以进一步验证和扩展当前的发现,以及探讨TMH培训计划对提供者态度和患者结局的潜在长期影响。