PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
BACKGROUND: Chronic wound care remains a critical public health challenge in terms of prevalence, quality of life and healthcare costs on a global scale. Currently used methods to assess the size and content of wounds include direct contact techniques based on double-layer film, ruler measurements, digital photography and visual examination. Nowadays, despite these evaluations, close monitoring and tracking of these chronic wounds remain a great challenge. The use of telemonitoring through digital measurement tools may offer a potential means of improving healing management processes. Many studies have evaluated the size and content of the wound through digital devices such as mobile phones and computers. However, the clinical accuracy of these tools remains to be clarified. The objective of this systematic review is to assess and consolidate the current state-of-the-art digital devices for both quantitative (length, width, surface area, perimeter, volume and depth) and qualitative (granulation, fibrin, necrosis and slough) indicators of wound care.
METHODS: We will include studies using digital measurement methods from databases such as EBSCO, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Web of Science and EMBASE, limited to French and English publications until November 15, 2023. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines, selection involves two independent reviewers conducting title and abstract screenings, study selections, data extractions and risk-of-bias assessments using QUADAS-2. Discrepancies will be resolved through discussion or a third reviewer.
BACKGROUND: Primary data will not be collected in this study; thus, ethical approval will not be required. The study\'s findings will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.
UNASSIGNED: CRD42023396642.
METHODS: We will include studies using digital measurement methods from databases such as EBSCO, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Web of Science and EMBASE, limited to French and English publications until November 15, 2023. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines, selection involves two independent reviewers conducting title and abstract screenings, study selections, data extractions and risk-of-bias assessments using QUADAS-2. Discrepancies will be resolved through discussion or a third reviewer.
BACKGROUND: Primary data will not be collected in this study; thus, ethical approval will not be required. The study\'s findings will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.
UNASSIGNED: CRD42023396642.
摘要：
背景：就患病率而言，慢性伤口护理仍然是一个关键的公共卫生挑战，全球范围内的生活质量和医疗保健成本。目前使用的评估伤口大小和内容的方法包括基于双层膜的直接接触技术，标尺测量,数码摄影和视觉检查。如今,尽管有这些评价,密切监测和跟踪这些慢性伤口仍然是一个巨大的挑战。通过数字测量工具使用远程监测可以提供改善愈合管理过程的潜在手段。许多研究已经通过数字设备（如手机和电脑）评估了伤口的大小和内容。然而,这些工具的临床准确性仍有待澄清.本系统评价的目的是评估和巩固当前最先进的数字设备的定量(长度，宽度,表面积,周边,体积和深度)和定性(造粒，纤维蛋白,坏死和腐烂）伤口护理的指标。
方法：我们将包括使用来自EBSCO等数据库的数字测量方法的研究，科克伦图书馆,MEDLINE,WebofScience和EMBASE,限于法语和英语出版物，直到2023年11月15日。遵循系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目，选择涉及两名独立的审稿人进行标题和摘要筛选，研究选择，使用QUADAS-2进行数据提取和偏倚风险评估。差异将通过讨论或第三审稿人解决。
背景：本研究将不收集主要数据；因此，不需要道德批准。这项研究的结果将发表在同行评审的期刊上。
■CRD42023396642。
方法：我们将包括使用来自EBSCO等数据库的数字测量方法的研究，科克伦图书馆,MEDLINE,WebofScience和EMBASE,限于法语和英语出版物，直到2023年11月15日。遵循系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目，选择涉及两名独立的审稿人进行标题和摘要筛选，研究选择，使用QUADAS-2进行数据提取和偏倚风险评估。差异将通过讨论或第三审稿人解决。
背景：本研究将不收集主要数据；因此，不需要道德批准。这项研究的结果将发表在同行评审的期刊上。
■CRD42023396642。
