PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
BACKGROUND: Online pornography use, an ever more common activity, has raised myriad psychosocial and clinical concerns. While there is a need to screen for and measure its problematic dimension, there is a debate about the adequacy of existing assessment tools.
OBJECTIVE: The study compares two instruments for measuring pathological online pornography use (POPU) that are based on different theoretical frameworks-one in line with DSM-5 criteria and the six-component addiction model and one in line with ICD-11 criteria.
METHODS: An international sample of 1,823 adults (Mean age = 31.66, SD = 6.74) answered an online questionnaire that included the Short Version of the Problematic Pornography Consumption Scale (PPCS-6) and the Assessment of Criteria for Specific Internet-Use Disorders (ACSID-11). Factorial, correlational, and network analyses were conducted on the data.
RESULTS: Both tools adequately screened for online \"addictive\" behavior, but the ACSID-11 was superior in assessing the degree of clinical risk.
CONCLUSIONS: Depending on the specific aim of the assessment (screening vs. clinical diagnostics), both online pornography measurement tools may be useful.
OBJECTIVE: The study compares two instruments for measuring pathological online pornography use (POPU) that are based on different theoretical frameworks-one in line with DSM-5 criteria and the six-component addiction model and one in line with ICD-11 criteria.
METHODS: An international sample of 1,823 adults (Mean age = 31.66, SD = 6.74) answered an online questionnaire that included the Short Version of the Problematic Pornography Consumption Scale (PPCS-6) and the Assessment of Criteria for Specific Internet-Use Disorders (ACSID-11). Factorial, correlational, and network analyses were conducted on the data.
RESULTS: Both tools adequately screened for online \"addictive\" behavior, but the ACSID-11 was superior in assessing the degree of clinical risk.
CONCLUSIONS: Depending on the specific aim of the assessment (screening vs. clinical diagnostics), both online pornography measurement tools may be useful.
摘要：
背景：网络色情使用，越来越常见的活动，引发了无数的社会心理和临床问题。虽然需要筛选和衡量其问题维度，关于现有评估工具的充分性存在争议。
目的：该研究比较了两种基于不同理论框架的用于测量病理性在线色情使用（POPU）的工具，一种符合DSM-5标准和六成分成瘾模型，另一种符合ICD-11标准。
方法：一个国际样本1,823名成年人（平均年龄=31.66，SD=6.74）回答了一个在线问卷，其中包括有问题色情消费量表的简短版本（PPCS-6）和特定互联网使用障碍评估标准（ACSID-11）。阶乘,相关，并对数据进行了网络分析。
结果：这两种工具都充分筛选了在线“上瘾”行为，但ACSID-11在评估临床风险程度方面更胜一筹.
结论：取决于评估的具体目标(筛查与临床诊断），这两种在线色情测量工具都可能有用。
目的：该研究比较了两种基于不同理论框架的用于测量病理性在线色情使用（POPU）的工具，一种符合DSM-5标准和六成分成瘾模型，另一种符合ICD-11标准。
方法：一个国际样本1,823名成年人（平均年龄=31.66，SD=6.74）回答了一个在线问卷，其中包括有问题色情消费量表的简短版本（PPCS-6）和特定互联网使用障碍评估标准（ACSID-11）。阶乘,相关，并对数据进行了网络分析。
结果：这两种工具都充分筛选了在线“上瘾”行为，但ACSID-11在评估临床风险程度方面更胜一筹.
结论：取决于评估的具体目标(筛查与临床诊断），这两种在线色情测量工具都可能有用。
