PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
UNASSIGNED: Forest conservation is a major global policy goal, due to the role forests play in climate change mitigation and biodiversity conservation. It is well recognized that the introduction of policies, whether aimed at forest conservation or with other objectives, has the potential to trigger unintended outcomes, such as displacement or leakage, which can undermine policy objectives. However, a set of outcomes that has escaped detailed scrutiny are anticipatory forest use behaviours, emerging when forest stakeholders anticipate policy implementation, deploying for example pre-emptive forest clearing, resulting in detrimental environmental outcomes. Lack of understanding of the extent and sectorial scope of these behaviours prevents us from devising strategies to address their potential detrimental consequences.
UNASSIGNED: This protocol presents the methodology that will be followed to conduct a systematic map to identify, compile, review and describe the evidence available on anticipatory forest use behaviours in the context of policy introduction around the world. We will use two complementary search strategies, which we have tested before submitting this protocol. First, a systematic bibliographic search, and second, a citation chase approach. We will include articles based on a pre-defined set of criteria defined according to a Population, Intervention and Outcome (i.e. PIO) design. To support identification of knowledge gaps and clusters, we will report results of the systematic map in a narrative synthesis, an evidence atlas and other visualisations.
UNASSIGNED: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13750-023-00307-0.
UNASSIGNED: This protocol presents the methodology that will be followed to conduct a systematic map to identify, compile, review and describe the evidence available on anticipatory forest use behaviours in the context of policy introduction around the world. We will use two complementary search strategies, which we have tested before submitting this protocol. First, a systematic bibliographic search, and second, a citation chase approach. We will include articles based on a pre-defined set of criteria defined according to a Population, Intervention and Outcome (i.e. PIO) design. To support identification of knowledge gaps and clusters, we will report results of the systematic map in a narrative synthesis, an evidence atlas and other visualisations.
UNASSIGNED: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13750-023-00307-0.
摘要：
■森林保护是一项主要的全球政策目标，由于森林在减缓气候变化和保护生物多样性方面的作用。众所周知，政策的出台，无论是针对森林保护还是其他目标，有可能引发意想不到的结果，如位移或泄漏，这可能会破坏政策目标。然而,一系列没有经过详细审查的结果是预期的森林使用行为，当森林利益相关者预期政策执行时，部署例如先发制人的森林清理，造成有害的环境后果。缺乏对这些行为的程度和部门范围的了解，使我们无法制定策略来解决其潜在的有害后果。
■该协议提出了将遵循的方法，以进行系统的地图来识别，compile,审查和描述在全球政策出台背景下关于预期森林使用行为的现有证据。我们将使用两种互补的搜索策略，在提交本协议之前我们已经测试过了。首先,系统的书目搜索，第二,引用追逐方法。我们将包括基于根据人口定义的一组预定义标准的文章，干预和结果（即PIO）设计。为了支持识别知识差距和集群，我们将以叙事综合的方式报告系统地图的结果，证据图集和其他可视化。
■在线版本包含补充材料，可在10.1186/s13750-023-00307-0获得。
■该协议提出了将遵循的方法，以进行系统的地图来识别，compile,审查和描述在全球政策出台背景下关于预期森林使用行为的现有证据。我们将使用两种互补的搜索策略，在提交本协议之前我们已经测试过了。首先,系统的书目搜索，第二,引用追逐方法。我们将包括基于根据人口定义的一组预定义标准的文章，干预和结果（即PIO）设计。为了支持识别知识差距和集群，我们将以叙事综合的方式报告系统地图的结果，证据图集和其他可视化。
■在线版本包含补充材料，可在10.1186/s13750-023-00307-0获得。
