Abstract：
Presenteeism has been noted to be associated with cognitive factors of pain, such as pain catastrophizing (PC) and pain self-efficacy (PS). Pain perception differs by gender, so it is important to consider gender differences when examining the association between cognitive factors of pain and presenteeism. This study aimed to examine the association between presenteeism and cognitive factors of pain, taking gender differences into account. A cross-sectional survey of 305 workers was conducted using a self-administered questionnaire that included items on pain status, PC, PS, and work performance. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to test whether PC and PS independently influence presenteeism, separately for men and women. Logistic regression analysis showed that PC was extracted in men, and the group with severe PC had higher odds of presenteeism (odds ratio 6.56, 95%confidence interval [CI] 1.83-23.40). Contrarily, PS was extracted in women, with higher odds of presenteeism in the moderate (odds ratio 2.54, 95%CI 1.01-6.39) and low (odds ratio 5.43, 95%CI 1.31-22.50) PS groups than in the high PS. This study showed that the cognitive factors of pain related to presenteeism may differ by gender.
摘要：
已注意到与疼痛的认知因素有关，如疼痛灾难化(PC)和疼痛自我效能感(PS)。疼痛感知因性别而异，因此，在研究疼痛的认知因素与出现之间的关联时，考虑性别差异是很重要的。这项研究的目的是检查与疼痛的认知因素之间的关系，考虑到性别差异。使用自我管理的问卷对305名工人进行了横断面调查，其中包括有关疼痛状况的项目，PC,PS,和工作表现。多元logistic回归分析用于检验PC和PS是否独立影响出现。男女分开。Logistic回归分析显示,男性中提取PC,而重度PC组出现运动率较高(比值比6.56,95%置信区间[CI]1.83-23.40).相反，PS是从女性身上提取的，与高PS组相比,中等PS组(比值比2.54,95CI1.01-6.39)和低PS组(比值比5.43,95CI1.31-22.50)的出现概率更高。这项研究表明，与出现有关的疼痛的认知因素可能因性别而异。
